Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumWarranties, Representations, and Concealment

A business owner applies for a commercial general liability insurance policy. The application asks, "Has the business been sued for premises liability in the past ten years?" The owner answers "No," genuinely forgetting a minor slip-and-fall lawsuit from eight years ago that was quickly dismissed out of court. State law dictates that statements on insurance applications are considered representations. Later, a customer suffers a severe injury on the premises and files a major lawsuit. During the claim investigation, the insurer discovers the prior dismissed lawsuit. The insurer's underwriting guidelines confirm that knowing about the old, dismissed suit would not have affected the premium rate or the decision to issue the policy. Based on insurance contract law, what is the legal status of the policy and the current claim?

  1. The policy remains in force and the claim is covered because the misstatement was a representation that was not material to the risk.Answer
  2. B
    The policy is voided because the false statement is treated as a breached warranty, which requires absolute truthfulness regardless of underwriting impact.
  3. C
    The insurer will deny the claim because any inaccurate statement on a formal insurance application constitutes intentional concealment.
  4. D
    The claim processing will be suspended until the insurance producer unilaterally updates the original application to reflect the previous lawsuit.

Answer

The policy remains in force and the claim is covered because the misstatement was a representation that was not material to the risk.
The correct answer accurately identifies that statements on an application are generally representations, not warranties. For a misrepresentation to legally void an insurance policy, it must be material—meaning it would have altered the underwriter's decision to issue the policy or the premium charged. Since the prior lawsuit would not have affected the policy's issuance, the false statement is immaterial, and the policy remains perfectly valid to cover the current claim.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the legal nature of the applicant's statement.
The scenario explicitly states that the applicant's answer is a representation, which is a statement believed to be true to the best of the applicant's knowledge.
This establishes the legal standard for evaluating the misstatement, distinguishing it from a strict warranty.
2
Determine the materiality of the false statement.
The insurer's guidelines confirm that the old lawsuit would not have changed the premium or the decision to issue the policy. Therefore, the misstatement is immaterial.
For a representation to void a policy, it must be both false and material to the risk.
3
Conclude the legal impact on the current claim.
Because the false representation lacked materiality, the insurer cannot void the policy or deny the claim based on the misstatement.
Insurers cannot use immaterial misrepresentations as a legal basis to avoid paying a valid claim.

Key Concept

Representations and Materiality
Rate this question

Topics

Warranties, Representations, and Concealment

More questions from this topic