Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardSignatures and Application Changes

Vertex Logistics, a business entity, is applying for a key-person life insurance policy on its Chief Executive Officer, Marcus. Sarah, the corporate treasurer, acts as the authorized applicant and signs the paper application on behalf of the corporation. Before submitting the application to the insurer, Producer Vance discovers that Sarah provided an incorrect corporate billing address and left a question regarding Marcus's hazardous avocations completely blank. Based on the legal protocols for signatures, application changes, and omissions, which of the following statements are correct regarding this scenario? (Select all that apply)

  1. To legally correct the corporate billing address, the error must be struck through, the correct address written in, and the change physically initialed by Sarah as the applicant.Answer
  2. If the insurer issues the policy without requiring the avocation question to be answered, the insurer legally waives its right to contest a future claim based on Marcus's undisclosed avocations.Answer
  3. Because this is a third-party ownership arrangement, Marcus must physically sign the application as the proposed insured, in addition to Sarah signing as the applicant.Answer
  4. D
    Producer Vance may correct the billing address and fill in the blank avocation question himself, provided he secures explicit verbal authorization from both Sarah and Marcus over a recorded phone line.
  5. E
    Under the legal doctrine of apparent authority, Producer Vance is permitted to unilaterally correct the billing address on behalf of the applicant to expedite policy issuance.

Answer

The correct statements are that Sarah must initial the address correction, the insurer waives its rights if it issues the policy with a blank question, and Marcus must also sign the application as the proposed insured.
The correct statements accurately reflect three fundamental underwriting rules. First, any application change must be initialed by the applicant to prevent unauthorized alterations. Second, in third-party ownership scenarios involving an adult, both the applicant/owner and the proposed insured are legally required to sign the application. Third, if an insurer accepts an incomplete application and issues the policy, it legally waives its right to contest a future claim based on the information it failed to require.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the ownership structure to determine required signatures.
Since the corporation is the applicant/owner and Marcus is the insured, it is a third-party application. Both the applicant (Sarah) and the adult proposed insured (Marcus) must sign.
Consent of the insured and verification of their personal representations are legally required.
2
Determine the legal protocol for making changes to an already signed application.
The applicant must initial any changes. The producer cannot make changes based on verbal consent or assumed authority.
Initialing proves the applicant is aware of and agrees to the modified representations forming the basis of the legal contract.
3
Evaluate the legal consequence of the blank avocation question.
If the underwriter misses the blank question and issues the policy, the insurer waives its right to that information.
The doctrine of waiver applies when an insurer voluntarily relinquishes a known right, such as the right to demand a complete application before assuming a risk.

Key Concept

Signatures and Application Changes
Rate this question

Topics

Signatures and Application Changes

More questions from this topic