Examkin

Question

Difficulty: EasyWarranties, Representations, and Concealment

When applying for an individual life insurance policy, Sarah states on the application that she has not received a traffic ticket in the past five years. She genuinely believes this is accurate, having forgotten about a minor speeding ticket she received exactly four years and ten months ago. The insurer issues the policy at a standard rate. Two years later, Sarah passes away from an unrelated illness, and the insurer's routine claim review discovers the old traffic ticket. Based on insurance contract law, what is the most likely legal outcome regarding the death benefit claim?

  1. The claim will be paid because Sarah's statement was a representation, and the unintentional omission was not material to the risk.Answer
  2. B
    The claim will be denied because all answers provided on an insurance application are legally considered strict warranties that must be absolutely true.
  3. C
    The insurer will require the producer to unilaterally alter the original application to reflect the ticket before paying the claim.
  4. D
    The insurer will retroactively change her risk classification to substandard and refuse to pay the death benefit.

Answer

The claim will be paid because the applicant's statement was a representation, and the unintentional omission of a minor traffic ticket was not material to the life insurance risk.
The correct answer states that the claim will be paid because the applicant's statement was a representation. In insurance law, answers provided by an applicant are considered representations (statements believed to be true to the best of one's knowledge) rather than warranties (absolute guarantees of truth). If a representation turns out to be false, it will only void the policy if it is 'material' to the risk—meaning the insurer would have declined the policy or charged a higher premium had they known the truth. A single, minor traffic ticket from nearly five years ago is not material to a life insurance death claim, especially when the omission was unintentional.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the legal nature of the applicant's statement.
The statement was made to the best of her knowledge and belief, which legally classifies it as a representation rather than a warranty.
By law, statements made by applicants on life and health insurance applications are considered representations.
2
Determine if the misstatement gives the insurer the right to void the policy.
The misstatement was unintentional and involved a minor, nearly five-year-old traffic ticket, which does not significantly affect mortality risk.
For a false representation to void an insurance policy, the misstatement must be material to the risk being insured.
3
Conclude the legal outcome for the claim.
The policy remains valid and the insurer must pay the death benefit.
An immaterial misrepresentation does not invalidate the insurance contract.

Key Concept

Representations and Materiality
Rate this question

Topics

Warranties, Representations, and Concealment

More questions from this topic