Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumWaiver and Estoppel

A general contractor applies for a Builder's Risk insurance policy for a 1millionproject.Theapplicationexplicitlyasksiftheconstructionsiteissecuredwithaperimeterfence.Thecontractortruthfullyanswers"No."Despitetheinsurer′sinternalunderwritingrulesrequiringafenceforanyprojectover1 million project. The application explicitly asks if the construction site is secured with a perimeter fence. The contractor truthfully answers "No." Despite the insurer's internal underwriting rules requiring a fence for any project over 500,000, the company issues the policy and accepts the premium without adding a fencing condition. A month later, materials are stolen from the unfenced site. When the insurer attempts to deny the theft claim by citing its internal rule regarding unfenced sites, the contractor challenges the denial.

Based on legal doctrines in insurance, which of the following best explains why the insurer will most likely be required to pay this claim?

  1. A
    The underwriter exercised apparent authority to bypass the company manual, making the insurer strictly liable for all subsequent theft losses.
  2. B
    The insurer's issuance of the policy acts as a waiver, but the doctrine of estoppel still allows the company to enforce its standard underwriting rules once a loss occurs.
  3. The insurer is estopped from denying coverage because it waived its underwriting requirement by issuing the policy with full knowledge of the facts.Answer
  4. D
    The contractor's truthful answer is legally considered a representation rather than a warranty, which automatically nullifies any unwritten security requirements.

Answer

The insurer is estopped from denying coverage because it waived its underwriting requirement by issuing the policy with full knowledge of the facts.
The correct answer accurately identifies the cause-and-effect relationship between these two legal doctrines. By issuing the policy while knowing the construction site was unfenced, the insurer voluntarily gave up its right to demand a fence (waiver). Consequently, the insurer is legally barred (estopped) from using that same missing fence to deny a covered loss.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the insurer's initial action during the underwriting process.
The insurer knew the site was unfenced but voluntarily chose to issue the policy and accept the premium anyway.
This establishes the legal concept of 'waiver', which is the voluntary relinquishment of a known right (in this case, the right to require a fence or refuse the risk).
2
Determine the legal consequence of the insurer's waiver after a loss occurs.
Because the contractor reasonably relied on the issued policy for coverage, the insurer is now legally prevented from using the lack of a fence as a reason to deny the claim.
This establishes the legal concept of 'estoppel', meaning the insurer is stopped from reasserting the right they previously waived.
3
Evaluate the options to find the one that correctly applies both doctrines.
The option stating the insurer is estopped due to its previous waiver correctly aligns with insurance contract law.
It accurately connects the initial waiver with the resulting legal estoppel.

Key Concept

Waiver and Estoppel
Rate this question

Topics

Waiver and Estoppel

More questions from this topic