A logistics firm enters into an agreement to acquire a delivery van with a cash price of . The contract requires an initial deposit of followed by 10 monthly installments of each, stipulating that legal title remains with the vendor until the final installment is paid. After paying the deposit and 6 monthly installments, the firm defaults. Under commercial law governing credit transactions, which of the following accurately describes the vendor's legal enforcement rights?
- The vendor cannot repossess the van extra-judicially and must institute an action in court because the hirer has paid more than three-fifths of the total hire purchase price.Answer
- BThe vendor retains the right to extra-judicially repossess the van without court intervention because legal title remains with the vendor until final payment.
- CThe vendor cannot repossess the van under any circumstance and can only sue for the debt balance of because possession implies ownership transfer.
- DThe vendor can immediately repossess the van without court intervention because default automatically converts the contract into an unconditional credit sale.
Answer
The vendor cannot repossess the van extra-judicially and must institute an action in court because the hirer has paid more than three-fifths of the total hire purchase price.
Under the law governing Hire Purchase transactions, legal ownership remains with the vendor until all installments are fully paid. However, to prevent abusive practices, statutory regulations dictate that once a hirer has paid three-fifths () or more of the Total Hire Purchase Price, the owner's right to extra-judicial (direct) repossession is restricted. Here, the total contract price is , and the hirer paid (over ). Consequently, the vendor cannot repossess the vehicle directly and must seek an order of court.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Statutory Repossession Restrictions under Hire Purchase Agreements
Estimated Time:2m 30s