Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumSale of Goods Act: Provisions, Terms, Conditions, and Warranties

Under the Sale of Goods Act, a breach of an implied condition entitles the buyer to repudiate the contract and reject the goods, whereas a breach of an implied warranty entitles the buyer only to claim damages.

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is True.
Under the Sale of Goods Act, a condition is an essential term that goes to the root of the contract, conferring the legal right to repudiate the agreement and reject non-conforming goods upon breach. Conversely, a warranty is collateral to the primary purpose of the contract, meaning its breach entitles the injured party strictly to claim damages rather than terminate the contract.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the legal definition of a 'condition' under the Sale of Goods Act.
A condition is an essential contractual term going to the root of the contract.
Establishing the nature of the term determines the statutory remedies available upon breach.
2
Analyze the legal definition of a 'warranty' under the Sale of Goods Act.
A warranty is a subsidiary or collateral term to the main purpose of the contract.
Distinguishing warranties from conditions clarifies why rejection of goods is not permitted for minor terms.
3
Compare the statutory remedies for breach of each term type.
Breach of condition allows repudiation and rejection of goods; breach of warranty allows only monetary damages.
The Act strictly enforces different levels of legal redress based on term severity.

Key Concept

Distinction between Conditions and Warranties under the Sale of Goods Act
Rate this question

Topics

Sale of Goods Act: Provisions, Terms, Conditions, and Warranties

More questions from this topic