In constitutional governance, the executive organ frequently exercises delegated legislative authority through administrative orders and ordinances. When an executive ordinance directly contradicts an existing legislative enactment during normal constitutional rule, which of the following principles determines the legal standing of the executive action?
- The statutory law maintains legal supremacy over the executive ordinance, rendering the conflicting ordinance invalid unless explicit constitutional emergency provisions authorize temporary override.Answer
- BThe executive ordinance automatically supersedes statutory law because delegated legislative power grants the executive unchecked authority over existing legislation.
- CThe executive head enjoys constitutional immunity that shields all administrative ordinances from judicial review and invalidation by the courts.
- DIn a cabinet arrangement, the ceremonial head of state possesses independent discretionary power to enforce executive ordinances above parliamentary acts.
Answer
The statutory law maintains legal supremacy over the executive ordinance, rendering the conflicting ordinance invalid unless explicit constitutional emergency provisions authorize temporary override.
The correct answer correctly establishes that statutes enacted by the legislative organ take precedent over executive administrative ordinances under standard constitutional conditions, preserving the separation of powers and the doctrine of ultra vires unless explicit constitutional emergency clauses state otherwise.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Hierarchy of Executive Delegated Powers and Constitutional Limitations
Estimated Time:2m 0s