Question

Difficulty: Very hardIdentification of Main Idea and Supporting Details

Read the passage below carefully and answer the question that follows.

For decades, oceanographic research focused predominantly on the chemical and physical degradation of marine environments, leaving acoustic pollution relatively ignored. However, recent hydro-acoustic monitoring along the Gulf of Guinea shipping corridors reveals that low-frequency commercial vessel sound continuously masks the communicative vocalizations of coastal marine fauna. This chronic sonic disturbance disrupts vital inter-species navigation, schooling behavior, and reproductive signaling. While marine conservationists initially urged localized speed restrictions as a quick remedy, bioacousticians argue that isolated vessel dampening fails to address the cumulative acoustic footprint of expanding maritime trade. Consequently, marine ecologists now advocate for a comprehensive oceanic noise budget system—an international regulatory framework that establishes hard decibel caps on regional shipping lanes. Without such systemic policy shifts, local mitigation efforts remain mere cosmetic interventions in an increasingly noisy oceanic habitat.

Which of the following statements best expresses the main idea of the passage?

  1. A
    Low-frequency noise from commercial vessels along the Gulf of Guinea disrupts the communicative vocalizations and navigation of coastal marine fauna.
  2. Systemic international policy frameworks establishing acoustic budgets are necessary to effectively control marine shipping noise pollution.Answer
  3. C
    Localized vessel speed restrictions have proven effective in completely eliminating sonic disturbances in coastal shipping corridors.
  4. D
    Oceanographic research has traditionally focused on acoustic pollution while neglecting physical and chemical environmental damage.

Answer

Systemic international policy frameworks establishing acoustic budgets are necessary to effectively control marine shipping noise pollution.
The correct answer synthesizes the author's core thesis: isolated attempts at dampening vessel sound are inadequate, requiring a systemic international noise budget system to address marine acoustic pollution effectively.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage structure to separate background details from the central thesis.
The passage moves from background context regarding ocean acoustic noise to evaluating potential remedies (local speed limits vs. systemic policy).
Identifying paragraph progression helps distinguish evidence details from the ultimate conclusion.
2
Identify the author's primary argument and ultimate recommendation.
The author concludes that localized speed limits fail and advocates for an international noise budget system as essential to preventing cosmetic-only interventions.
The central thesis resides in the author's main conclusion rather than the evidence presented.
3
Match the core conclusion with the correct choice while eliminating distractors.
The statement emphasizing the necessity of systemic international policy frameworks reflects the author's main idea.
Supporting details and contradictory claims must be rejected.

Key Concept

Identifying the Central Thesis vs. Supporting Details
Rate this question