In the administration of Northern Nigeria under Indirect Rule, how was executive authority distributed between British Residents and traditional Emirs when operational policy conflicts arose?
- ATraditional Emirs retained sovereign legislative supremacy, preventing colonial officers from intervening in emirate decisions.
- BColonial Residents functioned purely as non-binding advisers without legal veto power over local administrative policies.
- Colonial Residents exercised overarching supervisory control, reserving the legal authority to modify or veto Emirate decisions.Answer
- DTraditional Emirs were completely removed from executive functions and substituted by direct British administrative officers.
Answer
Colonial Residents exercised overarching supervisory control, reserving the legal authority to modify or veto Emirate decisions.
Under Lord Lugard's Indirect Rule system in Northern Nigeria, traditional rulers (Emirs) served as Native Authorities responsible for day-to-day governance, local tax collection, and native judicial administration. However, ultimate legal authority resided with the British colonial administration. British Residents and District Officers exercised supervisory oversight and possessed final legal veto power over native administrative decisions.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Hierarchy of Authority in Indirect Rule