Following a gubernatorial election in Nigeria, a aggrieved political party candidate files a petition to challenge the validity of the declared election results, while the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) simultaneously seeks to try a presiding officer charged with ballot box snatching and forgery of result sheets. Which judicial bodies possess the statutory jurisdiction to determine the election petition and try the criminal offence, respectively?
- An Election Petition Tribunal for the election petition, and a standard Criminal Court (High Court or Magistrate Court) for the criminal prosecution.Answer
- BAn Election Petition Tribunal for both the civil election petition and the criminal prosecution of the presiding officer.
- CA regular State High Court for both the civil election petition and the prosecution of the electoral offence.
- DThe Federal High Court for the election petition, and an Election Petition Tribunal for the criminal prosecution.
Answer
An Election Petition Tribunal hears the election petition, while a standard Criminal Court (High Court or Magistrate Court) handles the criminal prosecution.
Under Nigerian constitutional and electoral law, post-election challenges regarding who won an election are heard exclusively by Election Petition Tribunals. Conversely, criminal offences committed during elections—such as ballot box snatching or falsification of results—must be prosecuted in standard criminal courts (High Courts or Magistrate Courts).
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Jurisdictional separation between Election Petition Tribunals (civil/electoral disputes) and regular Criminal Courts (prosecution of electoral offences).