In a constitutionally established federal system where residual powers are reserved for component units, a regional assembly enacts a law governing local traditional institutions and market administration within its borders. Subsequently, the central parliament passes a statute claiming exclusive authority to regulate all commercial and chieftaincy affairs nationwide. If the regional government challenges this statute in the supreme constitutional court, how will the court most likely resolve the conflict?
- AThe central parliament's statute overrides the regional law because federal legislation inherently possesses absolute supremacy across all administrative tiers.
- The regional assembly's law remains valid because matters not listed in the exclusive or concurrent lists fall under residual powers constitutionally reserved for component units.Answer
- CThe regional law is nullified because political sovereignty resides in the central legislature, granting it ultimate authority to redefine constitutional legislative lists at will.
- DThe central parliament's law prevails because component units in a federal arrangement retain legal sovereignty only over foreign defense and international trade affairs.
Answer
The regional assembly's law remains valid because matters not listed in the exclusive or concurrent lists fall under residual powers constitutionally reserved for component units.
In a federal system with constitutionally defined power lists, matters not explicitly enumerated under the central exclusive list or the shared concurrent list fall under residual powers. Residual powers belong exclusively to the component units. Consequently, the regional assembly has sole authority over local traditional institutions and market administration, making any central legislative interference unconstitutional.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Residual Powers and Limits of Central Legislative Supremacy in Federalism
Estimated Time:2m 0s