An economic researcher in Port Harcourt observes that an upward adjustment in cold-room electricity tariffs increases the operational preservation cost per unit of fish, causing individual fish vendors to raise their retail prices to maintain profit margins. The researcher subsequently submits a report asserting that the Rivers State Government ought to provide targeted electricity subsidies to agricultural preservation vendors to safeguard household nutrition. Which of the following statements correctly categorizes the methodological nature and economic scope of the researcher's observation and assertion?
- The observation falls under positive microeconomics, while the assertion represents a normative economic judgment.Answer
- BThe observation falls under normative macroeconomics, while the assertion represents a positive microeconomic statement.
- CBoth the observation and the assertion belong exclusively to macroeconomics because state government tariff policies affect aggregate market price levels.
- DBoth the observation and the assertion are positive statements within microeconomics because they analyze cause-and-effect relationships in a single commodity market.
Answer
The observation is a positive microeconomic statement because it objectively analyzes cause-and-effect relationships regarding individual firm costs and prices, whereas the policy proposal is a normative statement because it incorporates value judgments regarding what government policy ought to be.
The observation analyzes cause-and-effect relationships between production costs (electricity tariffs) and individual product prices (retail fish vendor prices), making it a positive microeconomic statement. In contrast, the report's assertion that the government 'ought to' grant subsidies reflects a value judgment on desirable public policy, placing it squarely in normative economics.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Scope and Methodology of Economics (Micro vs. Macro, Positive vs. Normative)