Under the voting procedure of the United Nations Security Council, a proposal to adopt a new item onto the Council's formal agenda is opposed by two permanent members who cast negative votes, while ten other members vote in favor. What is the legal outcome of this vote?
- The proposal passes because agenda adoption is a procedural matter where permanent members cannot exercise veto power.Answer
- BThe proposal fails because any negative vote cast by a permanent member constitutes an automatic veto on all Security Council decisions.
- CThe proposal is suspended and referred to the International Court of Justice for an advisory opinion on voting validity.
- DThe proposal fails because procedural motions require unanimous concurrence of all five permanent members.
Answer
The proposal passes because agenda adoption is a procedural matter where permanent members cannot exercise veto power.
Under Article 27 of the United Nations Charter, voting in the Security Council separates procedural matters from substantive ones. Adopting an agenda item is procedural. Procedural decisions require nine affirmative votes from any of the 15 members, and negative votes from permanent members do not constitute a veto.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Procedural vs Substantive Voting Rules in the UN Security Council