Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardAgriculture Sector: Roles, Problems, and Development Policies

Prior to their abolition in 1986, the Commodity Marketing Boards in Nigeria held monopsony power over the purchase of major agricultural export crops such as cocoa, palm oil, and groundnuts. From an economic policy evaluation standpoint, what was the major structural bottleneck created by the pricing policies enforced by these boards?

  1. They fixed producer prices well below prevailing international market prices, functioning as an implicit tax on smallholders and depressing long-run farm investment.Answer
  2. B
    They forced smallholder farmers to allocate agricultural land exclusively to domestic food production under an import substitution strategy.
  3. C
    They allowed the unconstrained operation of the free market price mechanism, exposing rural farmers to severe domestic price volatility.
  4. D
    They transferred equity ownership of state agricultural storage facilities directly to foreign private investors through commercialization programs.

Answer

The primary structural drawback of the Commodity Marketing Boards in Nigeria was that they set guaranteed producer prices significantly below world market prices, acting as an implicit tax that disincentivized smallholder farm investment and depressed output growth.
The Commodity Marketing Boards established in Nigeria held monopsony power to purchase cash crops from domestic farmers. By maintaining producer prices below international market prices, the boards accumulated financial reserves for state development projects. However, this functioned as a heavy implicit tax on agricultural producers, reducing profitability and disincentivizing investment in cash crop production.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the institutional mandate of Nigerian Commodity Marketing Boards prior to 1986.
The boards were established as single-buyer statutory monopsonies for export cash crops.
Understanding the structural role of marketing boards helps evaluate their pricing mechanism.
2
Evaluate the economic impact of the board's price-stabilization policies on farm incomes.
Rather than merely stabilizing prices, the boards continuously extracted economic surplus by paying farmers prices substantially below international market levels to fund government administrative expenditures.
This wage/price gap operated as an implicit tax on the agricultural sector.
3
Connect the pricing policy to long-term sector performance.
Suppressed producer prices reduced profit margins, disincentivized technology adoption and land expansion, and ultimately contributed to the decline of Nigeria's agricultural export dominance.
Identifies the core structural economic problem created by the policy.

Key Concept

Impact of Commodity Marketing Board pricing policies on agricultural production and rural incentive structures in Nigeria
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Agriculture Sector: Roles, Problems, and Development Policies