The national income data for an economy over two consecutive years is shown in the table below:
| Economic Indicator | Year 1 | Year 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal GDP | ||
| GDP Deflator | ||
| Population | ||
| Estimated Non-Monetized Output |
Based on these national income estimates and the standard limitations of national income accounting, which of the following accurately assesses the change in the average citizen's economic welfare from Year 1 to Year 2?
- Economic welfare declined because real per capita GDP fell from 2,000, compounded by a reduction in non-monetized output.Answer
- BEconomic welfare improved by 50% because nominal GDP increased from 75 billion.
- CEconomic welfare remained unchanged because real GDP stayed constant at $50 billion in both years.
- DEconomic welfare increased because population growth from 20 million to 25 million expanded the nation's total labor force.
Answer
Economic welfare declined because real per capita GDP fell from 2,000, compounded by a reduction in non-monetized output.
To evaluate economic welfare, nominal figures must be deflated to real terms and divided by population. Year 1 real per capita GDP was 50 billion / 20 million), while Year 2 real per capita GDP fell to 50 billion / 25 million). Furthermore, non-monetized subsistence production fell from 8 billion, meaning total real output available to households decreased overall.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Uses and Limitations of National Income Estimates in Measuring Economic Welfare