Nationalist leaders strongly criticized the Richards Constitution of 1946 for instituting what they termed 'regionalism without federalism.' Which of the following constitutional arrangements under the 1946 framework best justifies this nationalist critique?
- The Regional Houses of Assembly served primarily as advisory and deliberative bodies without independent legislative or financial autonomy, leaving ultimate legislative authority vested in the Central Legislative Council.Answer
- BThe constitution formally divided legislative responsibilities into Exclusive and Concurrent lists, establishing autonomous regional executive councils headed by regional premiers.
- CThe central colonial government abolished the central executive organ and devolved full sovereign legislative power directly to the regional houses of assembly.
- DThe regional legislative assemblies were composed entirely of members elected through direct universal adult suffrage across all provinces in Nigeria.
Answer
The Regional Houses of Assembly served primarily as advisory and deliberative bodies without independent legislative or financial autonomy, leaving ultimate legislative authority vested in the Central Legislative Council.
The nationalist critique of 'regionalism without federalism' stems from the fact that while the Richards Constitution established three administrative regions, the Regional Houses of Assembly were granted no independent law-making authority or financial powers. They functioned merely as advisory bodies to the Central Legislative Council in Lagos, preserving a unitary system of colonial administration.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The Richards Constitution of 1946 and Regionalism