Consider the following direct speech statement made during an official university senate hearing: "If the administration had implemented the revised welfare policy last year, the staff union would not be striking today," the registrar remarked. Which of the following options correctly converts this statement into indirect speech?
- The registrar remarked that if the administration had implemented the revised welfare policy the previous year, the staff union would not be striking that day.Answer
- BThe registrar remarked that if the administration implemented the revised welfare policy last year, the staff union would not be striking today.
- CThe registrar remarked that if the administration had implemented the revised welfare policy the previous year, the staff union will not be striking today.
- DThe registrar remarked that if the administration has implemented the revised welfare policy the year before, the staff union would not have been striking that day.
Answer
The registrar remarked that if the administration had implemented the revised welfare policy the previous year, the staff union would not be striking that day.
The correct indirect speech conversion accurately preserves the past perfect conditional verb form ('had implemented'), retains the appropriate modal expression ('would not be striking'), and shifts both time adverbs ('last year' becoming 'the previous year' and 'today' becoming 'that day').
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Reporting Mixed Conditionals and Shifting Temporal Adverbials in Indirect Speech
Estimated Time:1m 30s