In a classic parliamentary system of government, the executive cabinet suffers a defeat in the legislature during a vote on the national annual budget bill. If the Prime Minister attempts to remain in office without calling for new elections, what is the constitutional implication of this defeat?
- AThe ceremonial Head of State automatically assumes supreme executive power and directs government operations until new elections.
- The loss of a financial supply bill serves as an implicit vote of no confidence, legally requiring the cabinet to resign or request parliamentary dissolution.Answer
- CThe judicial arm of government intervenes by issuing an injunction to compel the legislature to approve the budget.
- DThe administrative leadership of the civil service assumes political executive control over government ministries to administer funds.
Answer
The defeat on a financial supply bill constitutes an implicit loss of confidence, constitutionally requiring the executive cabinet to resign or seek parliamentary dissolution.
In a parliamentary system of government, the executive relies continuously on the confidence of the legislature to govern. A defeat on a vital money or supply bill (such as the national budget) is conventionally regarded as a loss of confidence. As a result, the Prime Minister and the cabinet are constitutionally required to resign or advise the Head of State to dissolve parliament for a fresh general election.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Supply Bill Defeat as a Vote of No Confidence in Parliamentary Systems