Question

Difficulty: MediumIdentification of Main Idea and Supporting Details

Read the passage below carefully and answer the question that follows:

For decades, agricultural experts in East Africa advocated for modern engineering solutions to halt hillside soil erosion in highland farming regions. However, recent studies in the Kigezi highlands of southwestern Uganda demonstrate that traditional stone-terracing systems, built by indigenous farmers generations ago, outperform concrete embankments in long-term soil retention. These stone terraces slow down surface runoff, allow rainwater to infiltrate deep into the subsoil, and trap nutrient-rich sediments without altering the natural topography. Furthermore, maintaining stone terraces requires minimal capital expenditure compared to imported construction materials, enabling low-income smallholders to preserve arable land independently. While modern agronomic interventions often collapse under extreme rainfall due to rigid structural designs, stone terraces possess flexible gaps that release excess hydraulic pressure safely. Consequently, regional conservation programs are now shifting focus from industrial civil works to scaling up community-led restoration of indigenous stone terracing as the primary strategy for sustainable highland agriculture.

Statement: The central thesis of the passage is that traditional stone terracing provides a more effective and sustainable solution for highland soil conservation than modern engineering methods.

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is TRUE because it correctly identifies the central thesis of the passage, which argues for the superiority and primary adoption of traditional stone terracing over modern engineering interventions for highland soil conservation.
The statement correctly identifies the central thesis of the passage. The entire passage is structured around showing why traditional stone terracing is superior to modern engineering interventions for soil conservation in highland agriculture, culminating in the main conclusion that conservation programs are making it their primary strategy.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the text structure to distinguish between the primary argument and supporting evidence.
The opening sentence introduces the contrast between modern engineering and traditional terracing. The concluding sentence confirms the main shift toward traditional stone terracing.
Identifying the overarching thesis requires reading beyond single descriptive details to find the unifying claim of the passage.
2
Evaluate specific details in relation to the main claim.
Details such as slowing surface runoff, minimal capital expenditure, and flexible structural gaps serve as supporting evidence explaining WHY stone terracing is superior.
Supporting details reinforce the central argument but do not constitute the main idea by themselves.
3
Compare the evaluated statement against the central thesis.
The statement synthesizes the full passage content into a comprehensive main idea claim.
A valid main idea statement must encapsulate the entire text's primary point without being overly narrow or focused on a single piece of evidence.

Key Concept

Distinguishing Central Thesis from Supporting Evidence in Informational Texts
Rate this question