Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardFourth Republic and Democratic Governance from 1999

In Nigeria's Fourth Republic, the Supreme Court has played a pivotal role in enforcing constitutionalism and resolving major disputes across executive powers, state governance, and electoral administration. How should the following landmark Supreme Court judgments be arranged in chronological order, from the earliest decision to the most recent?

  1. 1The Supreme Court judgment upholding the constitutional power of the National Assembly to enact nationwide anti-corruption legislation under the ICPC Act (AG Ondo State v. AG Federation).
  2. 2The Supreme Court judgment nullifying the legislative impeachment of a sitting State Governor for failure to strictly adhere to Section 188 constitutional proceedings (Inakoju v. Adeleke).
  3. 3The Supreme Court decision ruling that electoral votes belong to political parties rather than individual candidates, resulting in the declaration of an un-balloted primary winner as governor (Amaechi v. INEC).
  4. 4The Supreme Court resolution of the novel constitutional dilemma concerning candidate substitution following the death of a lead gubernatorial candidate prior to the conclusion of election results (Faleke v. INEC).

Answer

The correct chronological sequence from earliest to most recent is: 1) Upholding federal anti-corruption power under the ICPC Act (June 2002); 2) Nullifying gubernatorial impeachment due to Section 188 violations (January 2007); 3) Ruling that electoral votes belong to political parties in candidate substitution disputes (October 2007); 4) Resolving candidate substitution following a lead candidate's death mid-election (September 2016).
The correct chronological arrangement begins with the June 2002 AG Ondo State v. AG Federation ruling that established federal legislative jurisdiction over nationwide anti-corruption enforcement. This is followed by the January 2007 Inakoju v. Adeleke decision enforcing strict constitutional procedure for gubernatorial impeachment. Next is the October 2007 Amaechi v. INEC judgment establishing that electoral votes belong to political parties. The sequence concludes with the September 2016 Faleke v. INEC judgment resolving the constitutional dilemma of candidate substitution upon a lead candidate's death.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the year of the federal anti-corruption jurisdiction ruling (AG Ondo v. AG Federation).
The Supreme Court delivered this landmark judgment in June 2002 during the first administration of the Fourth Republic.
Ondo State challenged the federal anti-corruption framework, leading to early constitutional interpretation of Item 60(a).
2
Determine the date of the Oyo State gubernatorial impeachment procedural ruling (Inakoju v. Adeleke).
The Supreme Court voided Governor Rashidi Ladoja's impeachment in January 2007.
This judgment established that legislative impeachment must strictly comply with Section 188 of the 1999 Constitution.
3
Identify the date of the Rivers State candidacy and party vote ownership ruling (Amaechi v. INEC).
The Supreme Court delivered its final verdict in October 2007.
The court held that votes in Nigerian elections belong to the political party that sponsored the candidate.
4
Determine the date of the Kogi State candidate death substitution case (Faleke v. INEC).
The Supreme Court resolved this unprecedented legal dispute in September 2016.
The case arose following the death of Prince Abubakar Audu during the November 2015 Kogi gubernatorial election.

Key Concept

Fourth Republic constitutional jurisprudence and judicial adjudication
Rate this question

Topics

Fourth Republic and Democratic Governance from 1999