Match each structural provision of the Richards Constitution of 1946 on the left with its corresponding administrative or political consequence on the right.
- Establishment of Regional Houses of AssemblyCreated institutional regionalism without granting genuine legislative autonomy
- Unofficial majority in the Central Legislative CouncilProvided apparent African numerical dominance without real executive authority
- Governor's reserve and veto powersMaintained ultimate colonial oversight to override legislative decisions
- Integration of Native Authorities into regional representationFavored traditional rulers in governance, alienating educated nationalists
Answer
Establishment of Regional Houses of Assembly matches with creating institutional regionalism without granting genuine legislative autonomy; Unofficial majority in the Central Legislative Council matches with providing apparent African numerical dominance without real executive authority; Governor's reserve and veto powers matches with maintaining ultimate colonial oversight to override legislative decisions; Integration of Native Authorities into regional representation matches with favoring traditional rulers in governance, alienating educated nationalists.
The correct pairings accurately connect each structural element of the 1946 Richards Constitution to its historical effect: regional assemblies fostered regionalism while remaining advisory, the unofficial majority gave numerical presence without executive authority, the Governor's reserve powers safeguarded colonial veto authority, and reliance on Native Authorities favored traditional rulers over educated nationalists.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Structural features, regionalism, and limitations of the Richards Constitution of 1946