When an unconstitutional military regime seizes power by force, suspends the existing constitution, and enforces compliance through executive decrees, which type of sovereignty is it exercising in contrast to the ousted constitutional government?
- De facto sovereignty, because it maintains effective physical control and obedience without constitutional legitimacy.Answer
- BPolitical sovereignty, because coercive military rule embodies the ultimate electoral mandate of the populace.
- CDe jure sovereignty, because the enactment of military decrees automatically creates new constitutional authority.
- DExternal sovereignty, because domestic political authority is transferred entirely to sub-national regional units.
Answer
De facto sovereignty, because it maintains effective physical control and obedience without constitutional legitimacy.
De facto sovereignty describes a scenario where an authority exercises supreme practical control over a territory and its inhabitants, regardless of whether it possesses legal or constitutional title. When a military regime forcibly replaces a constitutional government, it holds de facto sovereignty through actual enforcement power.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Distinction between De Facto and De Jure Sovereignty
Estimated Time:1m 30s