Question

Difficulty: MediumWave-Particle Duality and de Broglie Wavelength

An electron of mass 9.0×1031 kg9.0 \times 10^{-31}\text{ kg} and charge 1.6×1019 C1.6 \times 10^{-19}\text{ C} is accelerated from rest through an electric potential difference VV. If the associated de Broglie wavelength of the electron is 1.1×1010 m1.1 \times 10^{-10}\text{ m} and Planck's constant is 6.6×1034 J s6.6 \times 10^{-34}\text{ J s}, what is the value of the potential difference VV?

  1. 125 V125\text{ V}Answer
  2. B
    250 V250\text{ V}
  3. C
    11.2 V11.2\text{ V}
  4. D
    62.5 V62.5\text{ V}

Answer

The accelerating potential difference required is 125 V125\text{ V}.
The de Broglie wavelength of an electron accelerated from rest through a potential difference VV is given by λ=h2meV\lambda = \frac{h}{\sqrt{2meV}}. Rearranging for VV gives V=h22meλ2V = \frac{h^2}{2me\lambda^2}. Substituting h=6.6×1034 J sh = 6.6 \times 10^{-34}\text{ J s}, m=9.0×1031 kgm = 9.0 \times 10^{-31}\text{ kg}, e=1.6×1019 Ce = 1.6 \times 10^{-19}\text{ C}, and λ=1.1×1010 m\lambda = 1.1 \times 10^{-10}\text{ m} gives V=125 VV = 125\text{ V}.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Relate kinetic energy to momentum and accelerating potential.
Ek=eVE_k = eV and p=2mEk=2meVp = \sqrt{2m E_k} = \sqrt{2meV}
An electron accelerated through potential VV gains kinetic energy equal to eVeV.
2
Substitute momentum into the de Broglie wavelength equation.
\(\lambda = \frac{h}{p} = \frac{h}{\sqrt{2meV}}\)
De Broglie wavelength is defined as Planck's constant divided by momentum.
3
Rearrange the equation to solve for potential difference VV.
\(V = \frac{h^2}{2me\lambda^2}\)
Squaring both sides allows isolating VV.
4
Substitute the given numerical values and calculate VV.
\(V = \frac{(6.6 \times 10^{-34})^2}{2(9.0 \times 10^{-31})(1.6 \times 10^{-19})(1.1 \times 10^{-10})^2} = 125\text{ V}\)
Performing the algebraic substitution yields the final potential.

Key Concept

de Broglie wavelength of an electron accelerated through a potential difference
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question