Suppose two indifference curves, and , representing a consumer's preferences for Good and Good , intersect at bundle . Bundle lies solely on , and bundle lies solely on , with bundle containing strictly more of both goods than bundle . Which fundamental economic assumption of ordinal utility theory is violated by this intersection, and what is its logical consequence?
- The axiom of transitivity and monotonic preferences; it creates a contradiction where a bundle with more goods yields the same satisfaction as a bundle with fewer goods.Answer
- BThe law of diminishing marginal rate of substitution; it causes the marginal rate of substitution to remain constant along both curves regardless of bundle composition.
- CThe principle of total utility maximization; it forces marginal utility to drop to zero at the point of intersection.
- DThe assumption of diminishing returns; it causes the budget line to become concave relative to the origin.
Answer
The axiom of transitivity and monotonic preferences; it creates a contradiction where a bundle with more goods yields the same satisfaction as a bundle with fewer goods.
Indifference curves cannot intersect because such an intersection violates the axiom of transitivity and monotonic preferences. If two curves intersect at a common point, transitive logic forces any two distinct bundles on those separate curves to yield equal satisfaction. However, if one bundle contains more of both commodities, monotonic preference requires it to yield strictly higher utility, producing a direct logical contradiction.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Non-intersection of Indifference Curves and Transitivity Axiom