A business owner enters into a written agreement with a wholesaler to purchase commercial goods, while in a separate situation, a mother informally promises to pay her daughter a weekly allowance for doing household chores. Which of the following correctly describes the legal presumption regarding intention to create legal relations in these two arrangements?
- The commercial transaction is presumed to carry legal intention, whereas the domestic arrangement is presumed not to create legal relations.Answer
- BThe domestic arrangement forms a binding specialty contract, whereas the commercial transaction is merely an invitation to treat.
- CBoth arrangements are presumed to be legally binding contracts because an offer was made and accepted in both cases.
- DNeither arrangement is legally enforceable because informal promises always invalidate commercial contracts.
Answer
The commercial transaction is presumed to carry legal intention, whereas the domestic arrangement is presumed not to create legal relations.
Under the law of contract, intention to create legal relations is a fundamental element. Commercial transactions carry a legal presumption that parties intend to create legally binding obligations. In contrast, domestic and social agreements between family members carry the rebuttable presumption that the parties do not intend to enter into a legal contract.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Intention to Create Legal Relations (Commercial vs. Domestic Agreements)