In a constitutional federation where both the central legislature and state assemblies hold concurrent authority to enact laws on technical education, a central statute directly conflicts with a newly enacted state law on the same subject. Which of the following constitutional principles determines the legal status of both laws?
- The central statute prevails, rendering the state law void to the extent of its inconsistency.Answer
- BThe state law automatically overrides the central statute because federating units retain ultimate legal sovereignty.
- CThe central government possesses the constitutional authority to unilaterally dissolve the state legislature for passing a conflicting statute.
- DBoth laws become invalid until a national referendum is convened to determine political sovereign approval.
Answer
The central statute prevails, rendering the state law void to the extent of its inconsistency.
In a federal system of government, matters on the Concurrent Legislative List are open to legislation by both the central government and the regional or state governments. However, to prevent legislative paralysis and maintain constitutional harmony, the constitution provides the doctrine of inconsistency. Under this doctrine, when a valid federal law and a valid state law conflict on a concurrent matter, the central law prevails, and the state law becomes void to the extent of the inconsistency.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Doctrine of Inconsistency in Federal Legislative Lists
Estimated Time:1m 0s