Grammatical Structure

902 questions

Question 521Question

The supervisor demanded of the security officer, "Will you hand over the key to the store before leaving today?" Which of the following options correctly renders this direct speech in indirect speech?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The supervisor demanded of the security officer whether he would hand over the key to the store before leaving that day.

Answer

The supervisor demanded of the security officer whether he would hand over the key to the store before leaving that day.
The sentence accurately transforms the direct question by introducing the reported clause with 'whether', changing the subject-verb order from question form to statement form ('he would'), backshifting the modal auxiliary 'will' to 'would', and shifting the temporal adverb 'today' to 'that day'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the reporting clause and speech type
The reporting verb 'demanded' is in the past tense, and the direct speech is a Yes/No question introduced by the auxiliary 'Will'.
Past-tense reporting verbs require tense backshift and corresponding adverbial adjustments.
2
Apply reported question conjunction and word order rules
Introduce the reported clause with 'whether' or 'if' (without 'that') and change the inverted question word order ('Will you hand') to standard statement order ('he would hand').
Direct questions become declarative statements when converted into reported speech.
3
Apply tense backshift and adverbial shift rules
Backshift the auxiliary verb 'will' to 'would', and change the time adverb 'today' to 'that day'.
When reported from a past context, present modals and relative time expressions must shift to match the past point of reference.

Key Concept

Reported Speech: Questions, Backshifting, and Adverbial Changes
Question 522Question

Select the option that appropriately fills the gap in the sentence to maintain correct grammatical concord: 'Neither the managing director nor the project coordinators _____ available for comment when the press release was issued.'

Show answer & explanation

Answer: were

Answer

The correct option is 'were'. In correlated subjects joined by 'neither...nor', the verb agrees in number and person with the noun phrase closest to it (proximity concord). Because 'project coordinators' is plural and the context is past tense, the plural past verb 'were' is required.
The choice 'were' adheres to proximity concord rules. When subjects are joined by correlated conjunctions such as 'neither...nor', the verb must agree with the subject closest to it. Here, the noun 'project coordinators' is plural and nearest to the gap, demanding the plural past-tense verb 'were' to match the past-tense contextual marker 'was issued'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the grammatical structure of the subject.
The sentence uses a correlated conjunction structure ('Neither...nor') joining two subjects: 'the managing director' (singular) and 'the project coordinators' (plural).
Correlated conjunctions require applying the rule of proximity concord.
2
Locate the noun phrase closest to the verb position.
The closer subject is 'the project coordinators', which is a plural noun phrase.
Under the principle of proximity, when subjects connected by 'nor' differ in number, the verb agrees with the nearer subject.
3
Select the correct verb form matching both number and tense.
The past-tense indicator 'was issued' establishes a past timeframe, making the plural past-tense auxiliary 'were' the only grammatically correct choice.
The verb must maintain both plural agreement with 'coordinators' and tense consistency with the rest of the sentence.

Key Concept

Proximity Concord with Correlated Conjunctions (Neither...nor)
Estimated Time:50s
Question 523Question

Which of the following options accurately renders the direct speech sentence below into indirect speech?

"How long have you been waiting here for the manager?" the receptionist asked the visitor.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The receptionist asked the visitor how long he had been waiting there for the manager.

Answer

The correct indirect speech form is: 'The receptionist asked the visitor how long he had been waiting there for the manager.'
The correct answer accurately applies all three mandatory transformations for reported questions: backshifting the present perfect continuous verb ('have been waiting') to the past perfect continuous ('had been waiting'), converting the spatial adverb ('here' to 'there'), and changing the question word order into normal statement word order ('he had been' instead of 'had he').

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the tense, aspect, pronouns, adverbs, and sentence type in the direct speech.
Direct speech: Present perfect continuous tense ('have been waiting'), second person pronoun ('you'), spatial adverb ('here'), interrogative sentence structure.
Converting reported speech requires systematically updating tenses, pronouns, adverbs, and clause structure based on the past tense reporting verb ('asked').
2
Apply backshift and word order rules for indirect questions.
The verb 'have been waiting' backshifts to 'had been waiting'. The interrogative word order ('have you been') changes to declarative order ('he had been').
In indirect questions, auxiliary verbs do not invert before the subject, and present perfect forms shift to past perfect.
3
Adjust pronouns and adverbs of place/time.
'You' refers to the visitor ('he'), and 'here' shifts to 'there'.
Spatial and personal references change to match the reporting perspective.

Key Concept

Tense backshift, adverb transformation, and clause word-order inversion in reported questions
Question 524Question

Complete the sentence below by filling in the blank with the grammatically correct verb form.

Fill in the blanks below

During the emergency council session, the minister recommended that the regulatory board the operating license of the defaulting petroleum company immediately.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

suspend
The verb 'recommended' introduces a mandative subjunctive clause ('that the regulatory board...'). In formal English, clauses following verbs of urging, demand, or recommendation require the base form of the verb (bare infinitive, such as 'suspend'), irrespective of subject-verb agreement rules or the tense of the main verb.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main verb and governing clause structure.
The main verb is 'recommended', introducing a dependent clause expressing a mandate or proposal ('that the regulatory board...').
Verbs expressing recommendation, demand, insistence, or suggestion mandate the use of the subjunctive mood in the following dependent clause.
2
Determine the correct verb form for the mandative subjunctive mood.
The mandative subjunctive requires the base form (bare infinitive) of the verb, regardless of the singular third-person subject ('regulatory board') or past tense matrix verb ('recommended').
In formal English grammar assessed in JAMB, the subjunctive verb remains uninflected ('suspend'), rather than taking third-person singular '-s' ('suspends') or past tense '-ed' ('suspended').

Key Concept

Mandative Subjunctive Mood
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 525Question

Read the following sentence: 'The passengers were waiting patiently at the terminal when the torrential rain suddenly ________.' Which verb form correctly completes the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: started

Answer

The past simple form 'started' correctly completes the sentence to show a past action interrupting an ongoing past event.
The sentence describes an ongoing action in the past ('were waiting') that was interrupted by a single completed action. In English grammar, the simple past tense ('started') is used for the interrupting event.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main clause verb tense
The main clause uses the past continuous tense ('were waiting'), establishing a past time frame for an ongoing event.
Understanding the established time frame is necessary to maintain proper sequence of tenses.
2
Identify the relationship between the main clause and the subordinate time clause introduced by 'when'
A sudden, completed action ('started') interrupted the ongoing background activity ('were waiting').
When a past continuous action is interrupted by another past event, the interrupting event takes the simple past tense.
3
Select the correct verb form
'started' is the only simple past verb form among the choices.
It maintains consistency of past tense and accurately reflects the aspect of a completed interrupting action.

Key Concept

Simple Past vs. Past Continuous Sequence of Tenses
Question 526Question

Complete the following sentence by supplying the grammatically correct form of the verb in the blank.

Fill in the blanks below

A comprehensive list of guidelines for the upcoming national examinations published by the board yesterday.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

was
The correct verb is 'was' because the head noun of the subject is 'list', which is singular. The intervening prepositional phrases 'of guidelines' and 'for the upcoming national examinations' contain plural nouns, but they do not alter the singular agreement requirement of the main subject.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the grammatical subject of the sentence.
The core subject noun phrase is 'A comprehensive list', where the head noun is the singular noun 'list'.
The phrase 'of guidelines for the upcoming national examinations' is a prepositional modifier and does not determine the number of the subject.
2
Match the singular subject with the correct verb form in the past tense.
The singular past auxiliary verb 'was' correctly agrees with the singular subject 'list'.
According to the rules of grammatical concord, a singular subject requires a singular verb regardless of plural nouns inside intervening prepositional phrases.

Key Concept

Subject-Verb Agreement with Intervening Prepositional Modifiers
Question 527Question

Read the incomplete sentence below:

'Having exhaustively reviewed the financial irregularities in the municipal council, ____________.'

Which of the following options correctly completes the sentence by maintaining logical modifier agreement and standard usage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: the panel submitted a detailed report to the anti-graft committee.

Answer

The correct completion is 'the panel submitted a detailed report to the anti-graft committee.' because the subject directly following the introductory participial phrase must be the agent performing the modifying action.
The introductory participial phrase 'Having exhaustively reviewed...' functions as an adjectival modifier describing an action. In standard English syntax, the noun or pronoun immediately following the comma must be the entity performing that action. 'The panel' is the logical agent that conducted the review, ensuring grammatically sound subject-modifier alignment.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory modifier and its grammatical nature.
The phrase 'Having exhaustively reviewed the financial irregularities in the municipal council' is a perfect participial phrase functioning as an adjectival modifier.
Participial phrases at the start of a sentence must modify the subject of the main clause that immediately follows.
2
Determine the logical subject capable of performing the action in the modifier.
The action of reviewing financial records requires a human agent or auditing body ('the panel').
Non-human entities such as 'a report' or 'the irregularities' cannot review financial records.
3
Evaluate the options to match the logical agent immediately after the comma.
Only the option beginning with 'the panel' correctly aligns the subject with the modifier.
Placing any other noun immediately after the comma causes a dangling modifier error.

Key Concept

Dangling and Misplaced Participial Modifiers
Question 528Question

Complete the sentence below by filling in the blank with the correct plural form of the noun in parentheses.

Fill in the blanks below

During their study of atmospheric conditions, the meteorologists recorded several rare (phenomenon) that affected weather patterns across the region.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

phenomena
The correct form is 'phenomena'. The word 'phenomenon' is a loanword of Greek origin. In formal register, Greek loanwords ending in '-on' form their plural by substituting the '-on' suffix with '-a'. The plural form is necessary here to agree with the quantifying modifier 'several'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the base noun and sentence context requirement.
The singular noun given is 'phenomenon', and the quantifier 'several' indicates that a plural noun is required.
Plural quantifiers must agree grammatically with plural countable nouns.
2
Apply foreign pluralization rules for Greek loanwords ending in '-on'.
Nouns derived from Greek that end in '-on' replace '-on' with '-a' to form the plural.
Formal English grammar preserves the classical plural inflection '-a' for scientific terms ending in '-on'.

Key Concept

Foreign Pluralization of Nouns
Question 529Question

Identify and supply the correct pronoun that maintains strict pronoun-antecedent agreement in standard formal English.

Fill in the blanks below

Neither the newly enacted policy nor the underlying statute has lost binding authority despite recent administrative changes.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

its
The correct pronoun is 'its' because when two singular antecedents ('policy' and 'statute') are connected by 'neither... nor', the pronoun referring to them must be singular. Because the antecedent refers to an inanimate concept, the singular neuter possessive pronoun 'its' is required.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the antecedent nouns and the connecting correlative conjunction.
The antecedents are 'the newly enacted policy' (singular inanimate noun) and 'the underlying statute' (singular inanimate noun), connected by 'neither... nor'.
Establishing the grammatical number of the antecedents and the rule governing the conjunction is essential.
2
Apply the rule of pronoun-antecedent agreement for singular subjects connected by 'neither... nor'.
When two singular antecedents are joined by 'neither... nor', the pronoun referring to them must be singular.
Correlative conjunctions like 'neither... nor' evaluate the connected items individually rather than combining them into a plural subject.
3
Select the correct singular possessive pronoun form.
The singular neuter possessive pronoun 'its' correctly corresponds to the singular inanimate antecedent.
Inanimate nouns take 'its' (without an apostrophe), distinguishing the possessive form from the contraction 'it's'.

Key Concept

Pronoun-Antecedent Agreement with Correlative Conjunctions (Neither... Nor)
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 530Question

During the panel session on academic misconduct, the dean stated that she would rather the student ______ the ethics committee before publishing the controversial article last week. Which verb form correctly completes the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: had consulted

Answer

The verb form 'had consulted' correctly completes the sentence.
The verb form 'had consulted' is correct because when 'would rather' is followed by a clause with a subject and refers to an unrealized past action (indicated by 'last week'), English grammar rules require the past perfect tense.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the syntactic structure of the sentence.
The clause contains 'would rather' followed by a distinct subject ('the student').
When 'would rather' is followed by a clause with a subject, unreal past subjunctive verb forms must be used.
2
Determine the time reference of the action.
The adverbial phrase 'last week' places the action in past completed time.
For past unreal preferences referring to completed events, the verb must be in the past perfect tense.
3
Select the appropriate verb tense.
'had consulted' is the past perfect tense form.
It correctly expresses regret or unreal preference concerning a past action.

Key Concept

Unreal Past Subjunctive after 'would rather'
Question 531Question

Read the sentence below: 'Neither the department head nor the assistant lecturers ______ available to attend the regional conference last week.' Which option correctly completes the sentence in accordance with the rules of subject-verb agreement?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: were

Answer

The verb form 'were' correctly completes the sentence in accordance with proximity concord.
When two subjects are connected by 'neither...nor', the verb must agree with the subject closest to it. Here, the noun phrase closest to the blank is 'the assistant lecturers' (plural), which requires the plural past-tense verb 'were'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the grammatical structure connecting the subjects in the sentence stem.
The subjects 'the department head' (singular) and 'the assistant lecturers' (plural) are connected by the correlative conjunction 'neither...nor'.
When subjects are joined by 'neither...nor', subject-verb concord is determined by the proximity rule.
2
Determine which subject is closest to the verb blank.
The plural noun phrase 'the assistant lecturers' is directly adjacent to the verb position.
The proximity rule dictates that the verb must agree with the nearer subject element.
3
Select the verb form that matches plural number and past tense context.
The past plural auxiliary verb is 'were'.
'were' provides both correct plural agreement with 'assistant lecturers' and temporal consistency with 'last week'.

Key Concept

Proximity Concord with Correlative Conjunctions
Estimated Time:45s
Question 532Question

Fill in the blanks in the sentence below with the appropriate modifier forms, paying careful attention to the distinction between linking verbs and action verbs.

Fill in the blanks below

Although the freshly prepared dish smelled , the quality inspector evaluated it before granting approval.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

The first blank requires the adjectival complement 'delicious' following the sensory linking verb 'smelled', while the second blank requires an adverb of manner such as 'meticulously' or 'thoroughly' to modify the dynamic action verb 'evaluated'.
Sensory verbs such as 'smell', 'taste', 'look', and 'feel' function as linking verbs when describing attributes of the subject, requiring predicate adjectives like 'delicious'. Conversely, dynamic transitive verbs such as 'evaluated' denote actions and must be modified by adverbs of manner like 'meticulously'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the verb type in the first clause preceding the first blank.
The verb 'smelled' is used as a sensory stative (linking) verb expressing a quality of the subject ('dish').
Sensory and linking verbs take predicate adjectives rather than adverbs to describe the state or property of the subject.
2
Determine the appropriate modifier for the first blank.
The adjective 'delicious' correctly completes the subject complement structure.
Using an adverb like 'deliciously' would incorrectly imply the dish possesses organs to perform the action of smelling.
3
Analyze the verb type in the main clause preceding the second blank.
The verb 'evaluated' is a dynamic action verb describing a deliberate activity performed by the subject ('quality inspector').
Action verbs require adverbial modifiers to describe the manner in which the action is carried out.
4
Determine the appropriate modifier for the second blank.
An adverb of manner such as 'meticulously', 'cautiously', or 'thoroughly' correctly modifies the verb 'evaluated'.
An adjective form like 'meticulous' cannot directly modify a dynamic verb.

Key Concept

Distinction between Adjectives after Linking Verbs and Adverbs modifying Action Verbs
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 533Question

Read the direct speech statement below:

"Why did you not inform me earlier that the board meeting had been rescheduled to today?" the director inquired of her secretary.

Which of the following options correctly renders the sentence in indirect (reported) speech?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The director inquired of her secretary why she had not informed her earlier that the board meeting had been rescheduled to that day.

Answer

The director inquired of her secretary why she had not informed her earlier that the board meeting had been rescheduled to that day.
The correct response properly changes the direct WH-question into statement word order ('why she had not informed'), backshifts the past simple tense ('did not inform') to the past perfect tense ('had not informed'), and updates the time adverbial ('today') to 'that day'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the reporting verb and sentence type
The reporting verb 'inquired' is in the past tense, and the direct speech is a WH-question beginning with 'Why did you not...'.
Past reporting verbs require tense backshifting, pronoun realignment, and adverbial changes.
2
Convert word order from interrogative to declarative structure
'why did you not inform' becomes 'why she had not informed'.
Reported questions do not use inverted auxiliary order or the auxiliary 'do/did'.
3
Apply backshifting to the main verb tense
The simple past 'did not inform' shifts back to the past perfect 'had not informed'. The past perfect 'had been rescheduled' remains in the past perfect form.
Simple past tenses shift to past perfect when converted into indirect speech under a past reporting verb.
4
Adjust time and place adverbs
'today' changes to 'that day'.
Time expressions indicating present or immediate context must shift to match the reported perspective.

Key Concept

Direct to Indirect Speech Transformation of WH-Questions with Tense Backshifting and Adverbial Shifts
Question 534Question

Complete the sentence below by filling in the blank with the appropriate subordinating conjunction that expresses precaution.

Fill in the blanks below

The chief security officer ordered a comprehensive audit of the network protocols sensitive financial data should be compromised during the system migration.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

lest
The conjunction 'lest' means 'for fear that' or 'to prevent the possibility of'. In formal English clause structure, 'lest' introduces an adverbial clause of purpose/precaution and requires the subjunctive mood or the auxiliary verb 'should'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the semantic relationship between the main clause and the subordinate clause.
The main clause describes a precautionary action ('ordered a comprehensive audit'), while the subordinate clause expresses a potential negative outcome to be avoided ('sensitive financial data should be compromised').
Identifying the purpose of preventing an undesirable event narrows down the connective to conjunctions of precaution or negative purpose.
2
Examine the grammatical structure of the subordinate clause.
The subordinate clause uses the modal auxiliary 'should' paired with the base verb 'be'.
The subordinating conjunction 'lest' specifically governs clauses expressing fear or negative purpose and dictates the use of either the subjunctive mood or the modal verb 'should'.

Key Concept

Subordinating Conjunctions of Precaution and Purpose (Lest)
Question 535Question

Which modal auxiliary verb phrase best completes the sentence to express a logical deduction of past impossibility?

'During the trial, the prosecution demonstrated that the questioned deed contained a watermark first produced in 2018; therefore, the defendant _______ the document in 2015 as claimed.'

Show answer & explanation

Answer: could not have signed

Answer

The phrase 'could not have signed' is the correct choice because it conveys a logical deduction that a past action was impossible given the chronological evidence.
The phrase 'could not have signed' accurately conveys negative logical deduction regarding a past event. Given that the paper's watermark did not exist in 2015, it was logically impossible for the defendant to have executed the deed at that time.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the context and timeframe of the sentence.
The event refers to a past claim (2015) refuted by evidence established later (2018).
The modal structure must reflect past time aspect.
2
Identify the intended modality meaning.
The sentence requires a modal of logical deduction expressing past impossibility.
It is logically impossible for a document to exist in 2015 with a watermark created in 2018.
3
Select the correct modal form.
'Could not have + past participle' expresses negative logical deduction in the past.
Modal auxiliaries do not take infinitival 'to' and cannot be combined into double modals.

Key Concept

Modal Auxiliaries for Past Logical Deduction
Estimated Time:50s
Question 536Question

Complete the sentence below by supplying the correct conjunction to fill the blank space.

Fill in the blanks below

The committee's failure to reach a consensus was attributable not so much to a conflict of ideological principles to a total breakdown in communication among its members.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct conjunction to complete the sentence is 'as'.
The word 'as' is the correct conjunction because 'not so much... as...' is a fixed correlative construction used to join parallel prepositional phrases, indicating that the second explanation is more appropriate than the first.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the sentence structure and identify the correlative pattern.
The sentence introduces a comparative formula beginning with 'not so much [Phrase A]'.
Correlative structures rely on specific paired elements to connect parallel grammatical units.
2
Determine the standard paired conjunction for 'not so much'.
The expression 'not so much' pairs idiomatically with 'as' to form 'not so much... as...'.
This correlative conjunction clarifies that the second phrase is a more accurate explanation than the first.

Key Concept

Correlative Conjunctions and Parallel Clause Structure
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 537Question

Consider the following sentence: "Neither the principal investigator nor the laboratory technicians had remembered to submit _____ weekly safety logs to the department head." Which of the following pronouns correctly completes the sentence in accordance with formal English pronoun-antecedent agreement rules?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: their

Answer

The correct pronoun is 'their' because the nearer antecedent in the compound subject joined by 'neither... nor' is the plural noun 'laboratory technicians'.
When antecedents are connected by 'neither... nor', the pronoun must agree with the antecedent that is closer to it in the sentence. Since 'laboratory technicians' is plural and is closest to the blank, the plural possessive pronoun 'their' is required.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the antecedent structure in the sentence.
The subject contains a compound antecedent joined by the correlative conjunction 'neither... nor': 'the principal investigator' (singular) and 'the laboratory technicians' (plural).
The rule of proximity dictates that when antecedents of different grammatical numbers are connected by 'neither... nor', the pronoun agrees with the noun closer to it.
2
Determine the closer antecedent to the blank.
The noun phrase immediately preceding the pronoun blank is 'laboratory technicians', which is plural.
The pronoun must agree in number and person with 'technicians'.
3
Select the correct plural possessive pronoun.
'their' is the third-person plural possessive pronoun that corresponds to 'laboratory technicians'.
A plural antecedent requires a plural possessive pronoun.

Key Concept

Pronoun-Antecedent Agreement with Correlative Conjunctions (Rule of Proximity)
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 538Question

Complete the sentence below by supplying the correct form of the verb in brackets.

Fill in the blanks below

It is high time the school management (adopt) stricter measures to curb truancy.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

adopted
When the structure 'It is high time' is followed directly by a subject noun phrase ('the school management'), it requires the simple past form of the verb ('adopted') to indicate an action that should have already been taken.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the key grammatical marker in the sentence structure.
The clause opens with the expression 'It is high time'.
The expression 'It is high time' (or 'It is time') followed by a subject noun phrase sets up an unreal past construction.
2
Apply the appropriate verb tense rule for unreal past expressions.
The verb following the subject must be in the simple past tense.
Even though the statement refers to a present or immediate action that ought to be taken, English grammar requires the simple past form after 'It is high time + subject'.
3
Inflect the base verb 'adopt' into its simple past form.
The correct form is 'adopted'.
'Adopted' is the simple past tense of 'adopt'.

Key Concept

Unreal Past Construction with 'It is high time'
Question 539Question

Read the direct speech statement below carefully. What word or phrase correctly completes the blank to form its reported speech equivalent?

Fill in the blanks below

Direct speech: "I must submit the financial audit before the close of work today," the accountant said.
Reported speech: The accountant stated that he
the financial audit before the close of work that day.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

had to submit
When converting direct speech to reported speech with a past tense reporting verb ('stated'), the modal auxiliary 'must' expressing obligation backshifts to 'had to'. Therefore, 'must submit' correctly transforms into 'had to submit'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the tense and modal auxiliary in the direct speech clause.
The direct speech uses the modal auxiliary 'must' expressing obligation in the present context ('must submit').
Determining the original verb structure is essential to applying tense backshift rules.
2
Check the reporting verb tense.
The reporting verb 'said' (rendered as 'stated' in reported speech) is in the past tense.
A past tense reporting verb mandates tense backshift in the reported clause.
3
Apply the backshift rule for the modal auxiliary 'must' when expressing present obligation.
'must' backshifts to 'had to', yielding 'had to submit'.
In reported speech with a past reporting verb, modal obligation in direct speech ('must') changes to past obligation ('had to').

Key Concept

Backshift of Modal Auxiliaries in Reported Speech (Must → Had to)
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 540Question

Which auxiliary verb forms correctly complete the sentence below to maintain proper subject-verb concord?

Fill in the blanks below

During yesterday's proceedings, neither the chief magistrate nor the judicial officers present while the panel of experts presenting its findings.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

The first blank requires 'were' and the second blank requires 'was'.
For the first blank, proximity concord dictates that when two subjects are connected by 'neither... nor', the verb agrees with the subject nearest to it ('judicial officers', which is plural), requiring 'were'. For the second blank, the subject head is the collective noun 'panel', which acts as a single entity (indicated by the singular reference 'its findings'), requiring the singular verb 'was'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the subject structure for the first blank governed by correlative conjunctions.
The subject is connected by 'neither... nor' featuring a singular noun ('the chief magistrate') and a plural noun ('the judicial officers').
Under the rule of proximity concord, when subjects are joined by 'neither... nor', the verb must agree in number with the subject closest to it. Since 'judicial officers' is plural and the past tense context is established ('yesterday's proceedings'), the correct plural past auxiliary is 'were'.
2
Analyze the collective noun subject for the second blank.
The subject is 'the panel of experts'.
Although 'experts' is plural, it functions as a prepositional modifier to the collective noun head 'panel'. The collective noun acts as a unified singular body performing a single collective action ('presenting its findings', reinforced by the singular possessive pronoun 'its'). Therefore, it requires the singular past auxiliary verb 'was'.

Key Concept

Subject-Verb Agreement involving Proximity Concord and Collective Nouns
PreviousPage 27 / 46Next
Grammatical Structure Practice Questions — JAMB UTME — Page 27 | Examkin