In the context of the UK's uncodified constitution, consider a scenario where a newly passed Act of Parliament directly contradicts a long-standing principle established through historical judicial precedents. In such a conflict of authority, what is the resulting legal status of the Common Law principle?
- The principle of Common Law is overruled because Statute Law is the supreme source of legal authority within the UK constitutional framework.Answer
- BThe principle of Common Law maintains its authority because it represents the foundational precedents that all subsequent legislation must respect.
- CThe principle of Common Law remains in force unless the Monarch explicitly issues a Royal Decree to repeal the specific judicial precedent.
- DThe principle of Common Law takes precedence because the 'unwritten' nature of the constitution prevents written statutes from altering established traditions.
Answer
The principle of Common Law is overruled because Statute Law is the supreme source of legal authority within the UK constitutional framework.
Statute Law, which consists of Acts of Parliament, is the supreme source of law in the United Kingdom. Under the principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty, an Act of Parliament can change any previous law, including long-standing Common Law principles or even other Acts of Parliament. When such a conflict occurs, the newer Statute Law always takes precedence.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Supremacy of Statute Law
Alternative Method
Consider the term 'Parliamentary Sovereignty'—if Parliament is sovereign, it must be able to overrule any other source of law.
Estimated Time:1m 30s