The British constitution is often described as 'flexible' because it is uncodified. In terms of legal hierarchy and legislative process, which of the following best describes the relationship between 'constitutional' laws and 'ordinary' laws in the United Kingdom?
- There is no formal legal distinction between constitutional laws and ordinary laws; both are passed by Parliament using the same procedures.Answer
- BConstitutional laws must be approved by a two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament, whereas ordinary laws require only a simple majority.
- CThe Monarch holds the exclusive power to designate a statute as 'constitutional' to protect it from being repealed by future Parliaments.
- DConstitutional laws are derived solely from Common Law and judicial precedents, while ordinary laws are created through Statute Law.
Answer
There is no formal legal distinction between constitutional laws and ordinary laws; both are passed by Parliament using the same procedures.
The correct answer is correct because in the United Kingdom, there is no technical legal difference between a law that changes the constitution and a law that changes a minor regulation. Because the constitution is uncodified and Parliament is sovereign, all Acts of Parliament have the same legal status and follow the same legislative path.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Constitutional Flexibility and Parliamentary Sovereignty
Practice More
Research the 'Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949' to see how the relationship between the House of Commons and House of Lords is defined by Statute Law.
Estimated Time:2m 0s