The British constitution is famously described as "uncodified," meaning it is drawn from multiple sources rather than a single document. Given this structure, if a new Act of Parliament (Statute Law) directly conflicts with a long-standing, traditionally observed Constitutional Convention, which of the following best describes the legal outcome within the UK's constitutional framework?
- The Act of Parliament takes legal precedence because Statute Law is the highest form of law and can override any other constitutional source.Answer
- BThe Constitutional Convention prevails because it represents the fundamental traditions that define the limits of parliamentary power.
- CThe conflict cannot be resolved legally because the lack of a single written document means there is no established hierarchy between different sources.
- DThe reigning Monarch must exercise their political authority to determine which source should be followed in that specific instance.
Answer
The Act of Parliament takes legal precedence because Statute Law is the highest form of law and can override any other constitutional source.
The correct answer identifies that Statute Law is the supreme source of the UK constitution. Under the principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty, an Act of Parliament can change or override any other source of the constitution, including common law and constitutional conventions.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Hierarchy of Constitutional Sources
Practice More
Review the specific differences between Statute Law and Common Law to understand how judicial precedents interact with legislation.
Estimated Time:1m 30s