In an argument by elimination, competing hypotheses are systematically ruled out by specific premises until only one valid option remains. Match each proposed hypothesis for the sudden decline in a local bee population (left) with the specific evidence that logically eliminates it from consideration (right).
- The bees were killed by a newly introduced pesticide.Chemical analysis of the soil, pollen, and dead bees revealed zero trace of synthetic toxins.
- The hive was destroyed by a fungal infection.Laboratory autopsies of the bees found no spores or pathogenic mycelium in their digestive tracts.
- The bees starved due to a lack of local flowering plants.Botanical surveys show the area has an unusually high abundance of blooming flora this season.
- The population was decimated by predatory wasps.Careful observation of the hives showed no bite marks, defensive injuries, or invasive insect species.
Answer
Pesticide hypothesis pairs with the absence of synthetic toxins; Fungal infection pairs with the lack of spores; Starvation pairs with the abundance of blooming flora; Predatory wasps pairs with the absence of bite marks or invasive insects.
Each hypothesis is successfully eliminated by a piece of evidence that directly contradicts a necessary condition for that hypothesis to be true. Recognizing these connections is the foundational skill required to evaluate arguments by elimination.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Argument by Elimination
Estimated Time:1m 0s