Question

Difficulty: MediumExplicit Detail and Information Retrieval

Passage:
In 1824, the French chemist Michel Eugène Chevreul was appointed director of the dye works at the Manufacture des Gobelins, a royal tapestry workshop in Paris. Soon after his arrival, weavers and overseers lodged formal complaints regarding the perceived inferiority of the workshop's black and deep violet dyes, asserting that these pigments lacked chemical saturation and appeared dingy when integrated into complex figurative compositions. Chevreul undertook systematic chemical analyses of the mordants and organic colorants used in the vats, but found no evidence of pigment degradation, improper binding, or chemical impurity. Instead, he observed that the perceived lack of vigor in the dark wools occurred exclusively when those threads were bordered by adjacent, highly luminous hues or complementary tones.

Through a sequence of controlled experiments using juxtaposed swatches of colored paper and woven textiles, Chevreul deduced that the perceived hue and brightness of any given color are altered by the simultaneous perception of adjacent colors—a phenomenon he formalized as the law of simultaneous contrast. He demonstrated that when two distinct colors are viewed side by side, the human visual system involuntarily shifts each tone toward the complementary color of its neighbor. Consequently, a neutral black thread placed alongside a brilliant blue thread does not simply appear black; rather, the adjacent blue induces its complementary tone (an orange-yellow cast), making the black appear muted, brownish, or faded. Chevreul concluded that the apparent defect was an optical illusion arising from retinal and neural processing rather than a flaw in the workshop's chemical formulations, and he advised weavers to modify the juxtaposition of neighboring colored threads rather than reformulating the dye vats.

Statement: According to the passage, Chevreul's chemical investigations revealed that the black and violet dyes used at the Gobelins workshop showed no evidence of pigment degradation or chemical impurity.

Answer: Answer

Answer

True. The passage explicitly confirms that Chevreul's chemical analyses revealed no evidence of pigment degradation, improper binding, or chemical impurity in the dyes.
The statement is True because the passage explicitly notes in the first paragraph that Chevreul's systematic chemical analyses of the mordants and organic colorants found no evidence of pigment degradation, improper binding, or chemical impurity.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the key factual claim in the statement
The statement asserts that Chevreul's laboratory testing found no chemical impurities or pigment degradation in the workshop's dyes.
Explicit detail questions require verifying whether a specific factual claim is directly corroborated by the text.
2
Locate the relevant evidence in the passage
The first paragraph discusses Chevreul's chemical testing of the mordants and colorants in response to the weavers' complaints.
Information retrieval requires isolating the exact sentence addressing the chemical composition of the dyes.
3
Compare the statement against the explicit passage text
The text states that he 'found no evidence of pigment degradation, improper binding, or chemical impurity.'
Direct textual match confirms that the statement is factually accurate according to the author.
4
Determine the truth value
The statement is verified as True.
The statement accurately reflects the passage's explicit statements without introducing unsupported assumptions.

Key Concept

Explicit Detail and Information Retrieval
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Rate this question