Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumApplying Passage Principles

A passage discussing journalistic ethics outlines the "Principle of Justified Anonymity." According to the passage, a journalist is permitted to grant a source absolute anonymity if and only if three conditions are strictly met: first, the information provided must reveal severe institutional malfeasance or an immediate threat to public safety; second, the information must be impossible to obtain through any on-the-record channels; and third, the source must face a credible threat of extreme professional or physical retaliation if their identity is disclosed.

Based on the Principle of Justified Anonymity, in which one of the following scenarios is the journalist's decision to grant anonymity most clearly justified?

  1. A
    A journalist grants anonymity to a corporate executive who shares an exclusively obtained internal memo detailing the company's legally sound but highly unpopular decision to discontinue a beloved product line, because the executive would undoubtedly face termination if discovered.
  2. B
    A journalist grants anonymity to a whistleblowing engineer who reveals severe institutional malfeasance regarding structural flaws in a new bridge, even though an upcoming public safety commission report details these exact flaws, to protect the engineer from extreme professional retaliation.
  3. A journalist grants anonymity to a mid-level hospital administrator who provides exclusive internal records proving the hospital is knowingly using unsterilized surgical equipment, because the administrator would be permanently blacklisted from the medical field for releasing the files, which cannot be accessed by anyone else.Answer
  4. D
    A journalist grants anonymity to a renowned politician reporting an immediate threat to public safety, relying on the assumption that it is widely understood in the media industry that all public figures face intense media scrutiny, and this scrutiny equates to severe retaliation.
  5. E
    A journalist grants anonymity to a disgruntled city clerk who claims the mayor is embezzling funds, because the journalist is absolutely certain that revealing any municipal misconduct will result in physical retaliation, despite the clerk openly offering to testify in court.

Answer

The scenario describing a mid-level hospital administrator releasing exclusive internal records about unsterilized surgical equipment.
The correct answer perfectly satisfies all three necessary conditions established by the Principle of Justified Anonymity. The hospital's knowing use of unsterilized equipment constitutes an immediate threat to public safety (condition 1); the records are exclusive and cannot be accessed elsewhere, meaning there is no on-the-record alternative (condition 2); and being permanently blacklisted represents an extreme professional retaliation (condition 3).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the principle provided in the stimulus to identify the necessary conditions.
Three conditions are identified: (1) severe malfeasance/public safety threat, (2) impossible to obtain on the record, and (3) credible threat of extreme retaliation.
Applying a strict principle requires knowing its exact boundary conditions and ensuring none are violated.
2
Evaluate each scenario against all three established conditions.
Only the scenario involving the hospital administrator meets all three criteria: unsterilized equipment is a safety threat, the files cannot be accessed elsewhere, and blacklisting is extreme retaliation.
To be most clearly justified, a scenario must not fail any of the 'if and only if' conditions.

Key Concept

Applying conditional principles strictly to hypothetical scenarios without ignoring qualifiers or importing outside assumptions.
Rate this question

Topics

Applying Passage Principles

More questions from this topic