Question

Difficulty: MediumDetermining Statement Roles

Read the following passage from an essay on behavioral economics:

'Classical economists argue that consumers generally behave irrationally when purchasing complex financial products. Yet, this view ignores the reality that people frequently value stability over maximum profit. For instance, empirical studies demonstrate that most investors choose lower-yield fixed-rate bonds over volatile high-yield stocks during economic downturns. This pattern indicates that investors are intentionally minimizing risk rather than merely failing to maximize returns. Consequently, we must conclude that the traditional metric for measuring economic rationality is fundamentally flawed.'

Match each statement excerpted from the passage to its precise logical role within the argument.

  • consumers generally behave irrationally when purchasing complex financial productsA viewpoint attributed to others that the argument is designed to criticize
  • most investors choose lower-yield fixed-rate bonds over volatile high-yield stocks during economic downturnsA piece of empirical evidence offered to directly support a broader behavioral claim
  • investors are intentionally minimizing risk rather than merely failing to maximize returnsAn intermediate conclusion that serves as a bridge to the argument's final position
  • the traditional metric for measuring economic rationality is fundamentally flawedThe main conclusion that the entire argument is ultimately structured to establish

Answer

The correct pairings identify the opposing view, the empirical evidence, the intermediate conclusion, and the main conclusion in structural order.
The argument begins by introducing an opposing view held by classical economists, which it then pivots away from using 'Yet'. It provides empirical evidence about investor behavior as a premise. From this premise, it draws an intermediate conclusion that investors are intentionally minimizing risk. Finally, this intermediate conclusion is used to support the main conclusion, indicated by 'Consequently', that the traditional metric of rationality is flawed. The pairs accurately map each excerpt to these specific roles.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the first sentence and the pivot word 'Yet'.
Identified that the claim about consumers behaving irrationally belongs to classical economists and is rejected by the author.
To determine the role of the first excerpt, which is a viewpoint the argument criticizes.
2
Evaluate the statement introduced by 'For instance'.
Recognized that the observation about investors choosing fixed-rate bonds is empirical evidence supporting the author's counter-argument.
To classify the second excerpt as a factual premise.
3
Trace the logical flow from the evidence to the final sentence.
Determined that the claim about intentionally minimizing risk is inferred from the evidence and leads to the final conclusion.
To identify the third excerpt as an intermediate conclusion.
4
Identify the structural indicator 'Consequently' in the final sentence.
Concluded that the claim about the traditional metric being flawed is the ultimate point of the passage.
To confirm the fourth excerpt as the main conclusion.

Key Concept

Determining Statement Roles in Complex Arguments
Rate this question