Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardRuling Out Alternate Explanations (Defender)

A five-year epidemiological study tracked the neurological health and self-selected dietary habits of two large cohorts of elderly individuals. Cohort A maintained diets highly concentrated in flavonoid-rich berries, while Cohort B consumed diets nearly devoid of them. At the conclusion of the study, Cohort A exhibited a statistically significant lower rate of age-related cognitive decline than Cohort B. Because the researchers rigorously controlled for baseline neurological health at the study's onset, as well as for genetic predispositions and overall cardiovascular fitness, they concluded that the regular consumption of flavonoid-rich berries actively impedes neurological degradation.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the researchers' argument depends?

  1. A
    Elderly individuals who consistently consume flavonoid-rich berries also tend to engage in significantly more mentally stimulating activities than do those who avoid such berries.
  2. B
    Cardiovascular fitness plays a less significant role in preventing age-related cognitive decline than does the regular consumption of flavonoid-rich berries.
  3. Experiencing the onset of age-related cognitive decline does not alter an individual's dietary preferences in a way that leads them to avoid flavonoid-rich berries.Answer
  4. D
    Any elderly individual who maintains a diet highly concentrated in flavonoid-rich berries will completely avoid age-related cognitive decline.
  5. E
    Flavonoids are the only dietary compounds capable of actively impeding neurological degradation in elderly populations.

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that experiencing the onset of age-related cognitive decline does not alter an individual's dietary preferences in a way that leads them to avoid flavonoid-rich berries.
This is a classic Defender Assumption that rules out reverse causality. The argument observes a correlation over a five-year period between eating berries and retaining cognitive function, concluding that the berries protect the brain. However, it is possible that as individuals naturally began to experience cognitive decline during the study, they lost their appetite for these berries (placing them in Cohort B). If cognitive decline causes the avoidance of berries, the argument's causal arrow is completely backward. By assuming this reverse causal mechanism does NOT happen, the argument defends its conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the argument's conclusion and premises.
Conclusion: Regular consumption of flavonoid-rich berries actively impedes neurological degradation. Premises: A cohort eating these berries showed less cognitive decline over five years compared to a cohort that did not, with baseline health, genetics, and fitness controlled.
Deconstructing the argument isolates the core causal claim from the background evidence.
2
Analyze the reasoning structure and identify vulnerabilities.
The argument infers causation (berries cause less decline) purely from a correlation over time. Even with baseline controls, the correlation could be the result of reverse causality occurring during the five-year tracking period.
Causal conclusions drawn from observational studies always assume that the observed relationship is not coincidental, not caused by a third variable, and not operating in the reverse direction.
3
Apply the Negation Technique to the choices to find the necessary Defender assumption.
Negating the correct option yields: 'Experiencing the onset of age-related cognitive decline DOES alter an individual's dietary preferences in a way that leads them to avoid flavonoid-rich berries.'
A necessary assumption is one that, if proven false, destroys the argument. If the negated statement is true, the cognitive decline caused the lack of berries in Cohort B, completely destroying the researchers' conclusion that the lack of berries caused the cognitive decline.

Key Concept

Ruling Out Alternate Explanations (Defender) - Reverse Causation
Rate this question

Topics

Ruling Out Alternate Explanations (Defender)

More questions from this topic