Question

Difficulty: EasyAuthor's Attitude and Tone

Historians of cartography have long debated whether fourteenth-century Mediterranean portolan charts were drawn using precise compass bearings or rough coastal sailing itineraries. Dr. Hestia’s recent application of digital distortion-grid analysis provides a welcome empirical framework that clarifies several geometric anomalies in these early navigational maps. However, while her computational methodology is undeniably innovative and resolves key discrepancies regarding coastal angles, her broader conclusion—that medieval navigators possessed sophisticated mathematical projection techniques—overstates what the digital evidence can actually substantiate.

Which of the following best characterizes the author's attitude toward Dr. Hestia's research on portolan charts?

  1. A
    unreserved enthusiasm
  2. B
    complete dismissal
  3. qualified appreciationAnswer
  4. D
    strict neutrality
  5. E
    mild perplexity

Answer

qualified appreciation
The author expresses genuine praise for Dr. Hestia's computational approach, calling it a 'welcome empirical framework' and 'undeniably innovative,' but qualifies this praise by asserting that her broader historical claim 'overstates' what the evidence supports. Therefore, the author's stance is best described as qualified appreciation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify positive evaluative language in the passage
The author praises Dr. Hestia's work as a 'welcome empirical framework' that is 'undeniably innovative' and resolves key discrepancies.
Tracking positive descriptors establishes the foundational favorable stance of the author.
2
Identify qualifying language and reservations
The author uses the contrastive transition 'However' and notes that the broader conclusion 'overstates what the digital evidence can actually substantiate.'
Noting concessions and qualifications prevents selecting an overly enthusiastic descriptor.
3
Synthesize the two aspects into a balanced tone description
The combination of genuine praise for the methodology with a specific limitation on the conclusion yields 'qualified appreciation.'
The correct tone must encompass both the positive appraisal and the explicit limitation.

Key Concept

Author's Attitude and Tone
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Rate this question