Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardIdentifying Sufficient Assumptions

If a scientific paradigm is fundamentally unfalsifiable, it cannot serve as the foundation for a robust empirical research program. A paradigm is fundamentally unfalsifiable only if its core propositions are completely insulated from observable phenomena. Dr. Aris's new framework of consciousness features core propositions that are deeply intertwined with observable neurological phenomena. It follows that Dr. Aris's framework can serve as the foundation for a robust empirical research program.

Which one of the following, if assumed, enables the conclusion to be properly drawn?

  1. A
    A scientific paradigm is fundamentally unfalsifiable if its core propositions are completely insulated from observable phenomena.
  2. B
    The vast majority of scientific paradigms whose core propositions are deeply intertwined with observable phenomena eventually serve as foundations for robust empirical research.
  3. Any scientific paradigm that is not fundamentally unfalsifiable is capable of serving as the foundation for a robust empirical research program.Answer
  4. D
    Any scientific paradigm that can serve as the foundation for a robust empirical research program is not fundamentally unfalsifiable.
  5. E
    If a scientific paradigm is not fundamentally unfalsifiable, its core propositions are not completely insulated from observable phenomena.

Answer

The correct assumption is that any scientific paradigm that is not fundamentally unfalsifiable is capable of serving as the foundation for a robust empirical research program.
The correct answer perfectly bridges the logical gap in the argument. The premises establish that Dr. Aris's framework is not completely insulated (~CI), which proves it is not fundamentally unfalsifiable (~FU). However, the author concludes that the framework will therefore serve as a robust foundation (RF). The author has committed a flaw by assuming that just because unfalsifiable theories fail, falsifiable ones will succeed. The correct answer choice explicitly provides this exact missing rule (~FU → RF), allowing the conclusion to be drawn with absolute logical certainty.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Translate the first premise into formal conditional logic.
Fundamentally Unfalsifiable (FU) → NOT a Robust Foundation (~RF). The contrapositive is: RF → ~FU.
To establish the initial conditional relationship provided by the argument.
2
Translate the second premise into formal conditional logic.
Fundamentally Unfalsifiable (FU) → Completely Insulated (CI). The contrapositive is: NOT Completely Insulated (~CI) → ~FU.
To understand the necessary condition for a paradigm being unfalsifiable, triggered by the phrase 'only if'.
3
Evaluate the argument's factual application to Dr. Aris's framework.
The framework's propositions are intertwined with observable phenomena, meaning it is NOT completely insulated (~CI). Following the chain from Step 2 (~CI → ~FU), we deduce that Dr. Aris's framework is NOT fundamentally unfalsifiable (~FU).
To determine what is logically proven about this specific framework based strictly on the given premises.
4
Identify the logical gap between the deduced facts and the final conclusion.
The premises strictly prove that Dr. Aris's framework is ~FU. The author's conclusion is that the framework is RF. Thus, the author erroneously assumes that ~FU → RF (an illegal reversal of the first premise).
Identifying the author's logical leap reveals exactly what sufficient assumption is missing.
5
Formulate the missing sufficient assumption.
We must explicitly add the missing link: ~FU → RF (If a paradigm is not fundamentally unfalsifiable, it can serve as a robust foundation).
A sufficient assumption must perfectly bridge the gap between the proven evidence and the final conclusion.

Key Concept

Bridging conditional logic gaps by identifying illegal reversals and supplying the missing sufficient condition.
Rate this question

Topics

Identifying Sufficient Assumptions

More questions from this topic