Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardParallel Conditional Logic

A logging syndicate is granted access to the restricted reserve only if it employs sustainable harvesting techniques and passes an ecological impact audit. Passing this audit requires submitting a comprehensive wildlife protection plan. Apex Timber has not submitted a comprehensive wildlife protection plan. Thus, Apex Timber will definitely not be granted access to the restricted reserve.

Which of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to the argument above?

  1. A museum will restore a Renaissance canvas only if it secures specialized funding and hires a master conservator. Hiring a master conservator necessitates paying an international relocation fee. The museum cannot pay the international relocation fee. Thus, the museum will definitely not restore the Renaissance canvas.Answer
  2. B
    A farmer receives a federal subsidy if they rotate their crops and reduce pesticide use. Reducing pesticide use requires adopting biological pest control. The Miller farm did not adopt biological pest control. Therefore, the Miller farm will definitely not receive a federal subsidy.
  3. C
    A scholar's manuscript will be accepted for publication only if it undergoes peer review and passes a plagiarism check. Passing the plagiarism check requires utilizing authorized citation software. Professor Smith utilized authorized citation software. Therefore, Professor Smith's manuscript will definitely be accepted for publication.
  4. D
    A pilot can fly a commercial jet only if they complete flight simulator training and pass a medical exam. Passing the medical exam necessitates having pristine vision. Captain Reynolds can no longer fly a commercial jet. Thus, she definitely must not have pristine vision.
  5. E
    A chef is awarded a culinary medallion only if they design an original menu and maintain impeccable kitchen hygiene. Maintaining impeccable hygiene requires sourcing ingredients locally. Chef Dubois failed to source ingredients locally. Thus, it is highly unlikely that Chef Dubois will be awarded a culinary medallion.

Answer

The correct answer is the argument concerning the museum restoring a Renaissance canvas, as it perfectly replicates the logical structure and conclusion modality of the original argument.
The correct argument perfectly tracks the logical structure of the stimulus. It presents a necessary compound condition ('only if it secures specialized funding and hires a master conservator'), chains a part of that condition to a further requirement ('necessitates paying an international relocation fee'), denies that final requirement ('cannot pay...'), and validly concludes that the initial sufficient condition is entirely denied ('will definitely not restore').

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Diagram the formal logic of the stimulus.
Access granted -> (Sustainable techniques AND Passes audit). Passes audit -> Submits plan. Apex Timber did NOT submit plan. Conclusion: Apex Timber is NOT granted access.
Identifying the precise conditional relationships is required to find an identical structure.
2
Characterize the validity and modality of the stimulus.
The argument uses a valid Modus Tollens deduction across a nested conditional chain. The conclusion is framed with absolute certainty ('will definitely not').
A parallel argument must match not just the conditional structure, but also its logical validity and degree of certainty.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the exact structural match.
The museum argument dictates: Restore -> (Funding AND Conservator). Conservator -> Fee. No Fee. Conclusion: No Restore. This is a perfect match.
The correct option must replicate the 'A -> (B and C)', 'C -> D', 'Not D -> Not A' structure without introducing logical flaws.

Key Concept

Parallel Conditional Logic
Rate this question

Topics

Parallel Conditional Logic

More questions from this topic