Read the following excerpt drawn from a scholarly article examining the theoretical foundations of state authority, then complete the sentence below by identifying the precise terminology defined in the text.
Constitutional scholars traditionally bifurcated state power into two categories: 'juridical authority,' which encompasses the formally recognized legal mandate to enact and enforce laws within a territory, and 'coercive primacy,' which denotes the practical, empirical capacity to compel obedience regardless of underlying legal legitimacy. Contemporary theorists, however, propose a tripartite model that introduces a third dimension: 'axiological sovereignty.' This dimension describes an entity's moral right to demand compliance, contingent strictly upon its adherence to universal human rights frameworks, completely independent of both its legal recognition and its physical enforcement capabilities. When evaluating successful revolutionary factions that have ousted established regimes, observers frequently note a persistent paradox: these factions rapidly consolidate the practical means to govern, yet their international standing remains heavily disputed precisely because they are devoid of formal legal mandates and routinely violate fundamental human rights.