Question

Difficulty: MediumContextual Examples

Read the following excerpt:

'In the mid-twentieth century, the introduction of the standardized shipping container revolutionized global commerce. Prior to its invention, break-bulk shipping—in which loose cargo was individually handled by longshoremen—was so labor-intensive that the transshipment costs often exceeded the ocean voyage itself. The container drastically reduced these transshipment costs. However, its most profound economic impact was not merely making existing trade cheaper, but making entirely new, hyper-fragmented supply chains viable. For instance, before containerization, the prohibitive cost of transporting raw cotton to Asia and shipping finished garments back to Western markets meant that clothing manufacturing remained highly localized. Once containerization eliminated freight costs as a decisive barrier, apparel brands could decouple production from consumption.'

Statement: The author uses the example of the apparel industry (transporting raw cotton to Asia and shipping finished garments back) primarily to illustrate how the labor-intensive nature of break-bulk shipping made the transshipment process more expensive than the ocean voyage itself.

Answer: Answer

Answer

False
The correct answer is False because the author uses the apparel industry example to demonstrate how containerization enabled new, hyper-fragmented supply chains (decoupling production from consumption), not to illustrate the transshipment costs of break-bulk shipping.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Locate the specific example of the apparel industry (raw cotton and finished garments) in the passage.
The example is found in the sentence beginning 'For instance, before containerization...'
Contextual example questions require analyzing the immediate context surrounding the cited detail.
2
Identify the broader claim that directly precedes or follows this example.
The preceding sentence argues that the container's most profound impact was 'making entirely new, hyper-fragmented supply chains viable.'
Authors use transition phrases like 'For instance' to illustrate or provide concrete evidence for the immediately preceding abstract claim.
3
Compare the text's actual supported claim to the claim presented in the statement.
The statement incorrectly connects the example to an earlier claim about the labor-intensive nature of break-bulk shipping, rather than the correct claim about hyper-fragmented supply chains.
This structural analysis confirms the statement is a misattribution of the example's rhetorical purpose.

Key Concept

Contextual Examples
Rate this question