Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumStrengthen

Media Analyst: A popular streaming platform recently introduced a "skip credits" button. Data shows that subscribers who frequently click this button watch significantly fewer episodes per viewing session on average than subscribers who let the credits play out. Clearly, the physical act of interacting with the interface breaks the viewer’s narrative immersion, thereby prompting them to end their viewing session earlier.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the media analyst's conclusion?

  1. A
    Subscribers who only have time to watch a single episode before logging off are generally more impatient and thus more likely to actively skip the credits.
  2. B
    The data analyzed by the platform was collected during a holiday week when overall viewing patterns are highly irregular.
  3. Subscribers who enable an "auto-skip" setting, which automatically bypasses credits without requiring physical interaction, watch just as many episodes per session as those who watch the full credits.Answer
  4. D
    Subscribers who frequently click the "skip credits" button are also significantly more likely to use other interactive features, such as the "pause" and "rewind" buttons.
  5. E
    Most subscribers state in surveys that they strongly prefer streaming platforms that offer a "skip credits" feature over those that do not.

Answer

Subscribers who enable an "auto-skip" setting, which automatically bypasses credits without requiring physical interaction, watch just as many episodes per session as those who watch the full credits.
The analyst concludes that the physical act of clicking causes the viewer to end their session earlier. The correct answer strengthens this causal claim by showing what happens when the credits are bypassed without the physical act of clicking. Because viewers using the "auto-skip" feature watch just as many episodes as those who watch the full credits, it isolates the physical interaction as the crucial variable, ruling out the possibility that simply missing the credits is what causes shorter sessions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is that the physical act of interacting with the interface breaks narrative immersion and causes viewers to end their session earlier.
Understanding the exact claim being made is necessary to know what needs to be strengthened.
2
Identify the premises and the reasoning gap.
The premise is a correlation: frequent skip-button clickers watch fewer episodes per session. The gap is the assumption that the clicking causes the shorter sessions, rather than a third factor or reverse causation.
Strengthening a causal argument usually requires ruling out alternative causes or isolating the proposed cause.
3
Evaluate the options to find one that bridges the gap.
The correct option shows that when the effect of bypassing credits occurs WITHOUT the physical act of clicking (using an 'auto-skip' setting), viewing sessions are not shortened. This isolates the physical act as the true cause.
Demonstrating that the absence of the cause (physical click) leads to the absence of the effect (shorter session) powerfully strengthens a causal claim.

Key Concept

Causal Reasoning and Argument Strengthening
Rate this question

Topics

Strengthen

More questions from this topic