Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumRole in Argument

Consider the following argument:

Policy Analyst: Standardized screening algorithms flag discrepancies across tax filings far more consistently than individual investigators do. Because these screening tools operate solely on predefined variance thresholds, they eliminate human partiality from the initial case-selection phase. By removing human partiality while sustaining high consistency, implementing automated screening will substantially enhance both the equity and procedural efficiency of revenue enforcement. The revenue commission should therefore mandate automated screening for all corporate tax filings.

Arrange the following components of the argument in order of their logical dependency, starting from the foundational unargued premise and ending with the overall conclusion:

  1. 1Screening tools operate solely on predefined variance thresholds.
  2. 2Automated screening eliminates human partiality from the initial case-selection phase.
  3. 3Implementing automated screening will substantially enhance both the equity and procedural efficiency of revenue enforcement.
  4. 4The revenue commission should mandate automated screening for all corporate tax filings.

Answer

The foundational premise about operating on predefined variance thresholds leads to the intermediate conclusion regarding the elimination of human partiality, which supports the broader subsidiary claim of enhanced equity and efficiency, ultimately establishing the overall recommendation to mandate automated screening.
The argument proceeds in a strict linear dependency hierarchy: the factual premise that the tools operate on predefined thresholds supports the claim that partiality is eliminated; that result, combined with consistency, supports the broader claim that equity and efficiency will be enhanced; this overall benefit justifies the prescriptive conclusion recommending a policy mandate.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Locate the main conclusion of the argument.
Identified the normative recommendation that the revenue commission should mandate automated screening for all corporate filings as the final conclusion.
The word 'therefore' and the prescriptive force indicate that the entire argument is aimed at justifying this specific policy action.
2
Identify intermediate conclusions and their supporting grounds.
The claim that the tool enhances equity and efficiency relies on the claim that human partiality is eliminated, which in turn relies on the mechanical nature of predefined thresholds.
Recognizing the multi-tier inferential structure prevents conflating intermediate claims with foundational premises.
3
Determine the unargued foundational premise.
The statement that screening tools operate solely on predefined variance thresholds is asserted without support.
Foundational premises provide the baseline evidentiary support for the chain of reasoning.
4
Assemble the dependency sequence.
Ordered sequence from basic premise to first intermediate conclusion, to second intermediate conclusion, to overarching conclusion.
Each step in the sequence directly justifies the immediately following proposition.

Key Concept

Identifying hierarchical structural dependency among premises, intermediate conclusions, and main conclusions.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Role in Argument

More questions from this topic