Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumBridging Conflicting Premises

A popular ride-sharing company recently introduced a feature allowing passengers to pay a premium fee to guarantee that their driver has a flawless 5-star rating. The company expected this feature to motivate drivers to provide better service in order to maintain a 5-star rating and access these lucrative premium fares. Surprisingly, since the feature's introduction, the overall rate of customer complaints regarding driver rudeness has significantly increased.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy?

  1. Passengers who pay the premium fee have significantly elevated expectations for their ride and are far more likely to file formal complaints over minor inconveniences than passengers taking standard rides.Answer
  2. B
    To qualify for the premium fares, many drivers who previously had lower ratings have recently completed mandatory customer service training programs to improve their interpersonal skills.
  3. C
    The algorithm used to calculate a driver's star rating places a much heavier emphasis on the cleanliness of the vehicle and safe driving habits than it does on driver friendliness.
  4. D
    The total number of rides provided by the ride-sharing company has increased substantially across all regions since the premium feature was introduced.
  5. E
    Internal data shows that drivers who receive complaints regarding rudeness are also highly likely to receive complaints about arriving late to pick up passengers.

Answer

The statement indicating that passengers paying the premium fee have significantly higher expectations and are more likely to complain about minor inconveniences.
The correct answer successfully bridges the conflicting premises by showing how the mechanism intended to improve service (the premium fee) actually altered consumer behavior. If passengers paying the premium fee have much higher expectations, they will complain about minor issues that would normally go unreported. This perfectly explains why the rate of complaints increased even if the actual quality of service provided by the drivers improved or remained the same.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the apparent discrepancy in the stimulus.
The company introduced an incentive for better service (a 5-star premium feature), but the rate of complaints about driver rudeness increased instead of decreasing.
Understanding the exact nature of the conflict is required to find the premise that bridges the gap.
2
Determine what characteristics the correct answer must have.
The correct answer must explain how introducing a premium feature for highly-rated drivers could logically lead to a higher rate of rudeness complaints, without contradicting the premise that the feature was intended to motivate better service.
A valid resolution allows both original premises to be true simultaneously.
3
Evaluate the options against the required characteristics.
The option regarding elevated passenger expectations resolves the paradox. It shows that the threshold for complaining was lowered by the very feature meant to guarantee quality, thus explaining the increased complaint rate.
This introduces a new, unstated contextual factor (changed consumer behavior) that perfectly bridges the conflicting facts.

Key Concept

Bridging Conflicting Premises by Identifying Unintended Consequences
Rate this question

Topics

Bridging Conflicting Premises

More questions from this topic