The following arguments each rely on an unstated conditional premise to bridge their evidence to their conclusion. Match each argument with the strictly necessary conditional assumption that logically completes its reasoning.
- The rare alpine orchids require soil with a highly specific mineral composition to survive in the biodome. Since the researchers have successfully synthesized soil that perfectly mimics this composition, it is guaranteed that the orchids will survive.Any orchid provided with soil that mimics the necessary mineral composition will survive in the biodome.
- The city council refuses to raise commercial property taxes this fiscal year. Therefore, the new urban zoning initiative will fail to reduce downtown traffic congestion.A reduction in downtown traffic congestion cannot be achieved unless commercial property taxes are raised.
- A corporation is subject to federal antitrust scrutiny only when its domestic market share exceeds forty percent. Apex Industries recently acquired its largest competitor, bringing its market share to forty-five percent. Consequently, Apex Industries will now face federal antitrust scrutiny.Every corporation that commands a domestic market share exceeding forty percent is subjected to federal antitrust scrutiny.
- An action can be considered morally praiseworthy only if it is performed entirely out of a sense of duty. The altruistic actions performed by our local volunteers are motivated by deep empathy for others. Therefore, the actions of these volunteers are not morally praiseworthy.No action that is motivated by deep empathy for others is performed entirely out of a sense of duty.
Answer
Match the orchid argument with the assumption making synthesized soil sufficient for survival; match the traffic argument with the assumption making tax raises necessary for reducing congestion; match the antitrust argument with the assumption making market share sufficient for scrutiny; match the altruism argument with the assumption making empathy mutually exclusive with duty.
Each correct pairing provides the exact formal logical bridge required to make the conclusion of the corresponding argument valid, repairing illegal reversals, linking disparate terms, and forming logically sound contrapositives.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Identifying unstated conditional premises and recognizing illegal reversals (confusing necessary and sufficient conditions) in logical arguments.