For decades, evolutionary biologists debated the precise mechanism by which the mammalian middle ear evolved from the reptilian jaw. The dominant 'gradual detachment' model posited that as the primary jawbone expanded to handle mammalian chewing stresses, the secondary jaw bones were progressively freed from their load-bearing function, eventually migrating to the cranium to serve an exclusively auditory role. However, recent fossil discoveries of a Mesozoic mammalform challenge this linear narrative. These specimens reveal a transitional species possessing both a fully developed mammalian jaw joint and an intact, mechanically functional reptilian jaw joint. This anatomical redundancy indicates that the secondary bones did not simply shed their mechanical role as a strict prerequisite for sensory adaptation. Rather, the structural overlap suggests that ________.
Which one of the following most logically completes the passage?
- the evolutionary adaptation of these bones for auditory purposes proceeded while they were still integrated into the mechanical structure of the jawAnswer
- Bthe expansion of the primary jawbone was driven by evolutionary pressures to improve auditory sensitivity rather than to accommodate new chewing stresses
- Cthe secondary bones eventually migrated to the cranium to serve an exclusively auditory role in later mammalian species
- Dall transitional species in the mammalian lineage relied on a dual-articulation jaw joint before achieving complete bone migration
- Ethe dual function of these secondary bones resulted in a significantly compromised auditory capacity compared to that of entirely detached ear bones