Question

Difficulty: HardSufficient Assumption

Biologist: A localized ecosystem can successfully recover from the abrupt loss of its apex predator only if the population of its primary consumers is actively restricted and the habitat's foundational flora remains largely intact. In the Veridian Valley ecosystem, a viral pathogen recently eradicated the native cougar population, which served as the sole apex predator. Although state wildlife officials have implemented an aggressive culling program that is successfully restricting the population of primary consumers, the Veridian Valley ecosystem will nevertheless fail to recover from the loss of the cougars.

Which one of the following, if assumed, enables the biologist's conclusion to be properly drawn?

  1. In any ecosystem where aggressive culling programs are utilized to restrict primary consumers, the foundational flora does not remain largely intact.Answer
  2. B
    Any localized ecosystem in which the primary consumer population is actively restricted and the foundational flora remains largely intact will successfully recover from the loss of an apex predator.
  3. C
    The abrupt loss of a region's sole apex predator usually triggers cascading ecological effects that prevent the habitat's foundational flora from remaining largely intact.
  4. D
    If the state wildlife officials had failed to successfully restrict the population of primary consumers, the Veridian Valley ecosystem would not be able to recover.
  5. E
    The viral pathogen that eradicated the cougars has also severely weakened the immune systems of the remaining primary consumers in the Veridian Valley.

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that in any ecosystem where aggressive culling programs are utilized, the foundational flora does not remain largely intact.
The argument concludes that the ecosystem will not recover. According to the first sentence, recovery requires TWO things: restricting primary consumers AND keeping foundational flora intact. The stimulus tells us the first condition (restricting consumers) is being met through an aggressive culling program. Therefore, the only way to guarantee the ecosystem will NOT recover is to establish that the second condition (intact flora) is failing. The correct option links a known fact about Veridian Valley (it uses an aggressive culling program) to the exact outcome we need (the flora does not remain largely intact). If this option is true, Veridian Valley fails a necessary condition, proving definitively that it will not recover.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Map the formal logic in the biologist's first sentence.
Recover -> (Primary Consumers Restricted AND Flora Intact). Contrapositive: (NOT Primary Consumers Restricted) OR (NOT Flora Intact) -> NOT Recover.
Identifying the conditional relationships is essential when 'only if' introduces necessary conditions for an outcome.
2
Analyze the specific facts provided about the Veridian Valley.
Fact 1: Lost apex predator. Fact 2: Primary Consumers ARE restricted (via an aggressive culling program).
We must determine which parts of the conditional chain are currently met or unmet by the given scenario.
3
Identify the conclusion and determine the logical gap.
Conclusion: Will NOT recover. Since the first necessary condition (Restricted Consumers) is MET, the only way to mathematically guarantee the conclusion (NOT Recover) via the contrapositive is to prove that the second necessary condition (Flora Intact) FAILS.
A sufficient assumption must mathematically force the conclusion to be true based on the established rules.
4
Find an assumption that forces the required failure condition.
We need an assumption proving Veridian Valley's flora is NOT intact. An assumption linking the known fact ('aggressive culling program') to the required outcome ('flora NOT intact') bridges the gap perfectly.
Connecting an established premise to the missing piece completes the logical chain.

Key Concept

Sufficient Assumption in formal logic involving compound necessary conditions (AND/OR). To force the failure of a sufficient condition, one must trigger the contrapositive by ensuring at least one necessary condition is not met.
Rate this question