Question

Difficulty: MediumBridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions

Transportation Planner: Any infrastructure project that expands highway capacity inevitably encourages urban sprawl. The newly approved North Corridor expansion will add two additional lanes to the existing highway. Therefore, the North Corridor expansion will undoubtedly result in increased carbon emissions for the region.

Which of the following are assumptions upon which the transportation planner's argument depends? Select all that apply.

  1. Adding two additional lanes to an existing highway expands highway capacity.Answer
  2. Encouraging urban sprawl results in increased carbon emissions for the region.Answer
  3. C
    Any infrastructure project that results in increased carbon emissions for the region encourages urban sprawl.
  4. D
    The North Corridor expansion is the only infrastructure project currently approved for the region.
  5. E
    Infrastructure projects that do not expand highway capacity will not encourage urban sprawl.

Answer

The argument requires assuming both that adding lanes constitutes expanding highway capacity, and that encouraging urban sprawl leads to increased carbon emissions.
The correct choices bridge the two distinct logical gaps in the argument. First, the argument jumps from the North Corridor 'adding two additional lanes' to the premise about 'expanding highway capacity'. Second, it jumps from the consequence of 'encouraging urban sprawl' to the conclusion of 'increased carbon emissions'. Both connections are strictly necessary for the argument's conclusion to validly follow from its premises.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the argument's premises and conclusion.
Premise 1: Expanding highway capacity leads to urban sprawl. Premise 2: The North Corridor expansion adds two lanes. Conclusion: The North Corridor expansion will increase carbon emissions.
Identifying the structural components of the argument is the first step in finding logical gaps.
2
Identify the conceptual gaps between the premises and the conclusion.
Gap 1 is between 'adding two lanes' and 'expanding highway capacity'. Gap 2 is between 'encouraging urban sprawl' and 'increased carbon emissions'.
Supporter assumptions are unstated premises that connect the rogue elements of the argument together.
3
Formulate the required supporter assumptions to bridge these gaps.
Assumption 1: Adding two lanes expands highway capacity. Assumption 2: Encouraging urban sprawl leads to increased carbon emissions.
Without these logical bridges, the conclusion cannot be validly drawn from the given premises.
4
Apply the Negation Test to verify necessity.
If adding lanes does not expand capacity, or if urban sprawl does not increase emissions, the logical chain breaks and the argument collapses.
A necessary assumption must destroy the argument's validity when negated.

Key Concept

Bridging Gap (Supporter) Assumptions
Rate this question