Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardWeaken

Economist: Technological automation in the manufacturing sector has historically led to a temporary displacement of workers, followed by long-term employment growth. As machines take over routine tasks, production costs fall, lowering prices and increasing consumer demand, which ultimately creates new jobs in sales, distribution, and machine maintenance. Therefore, the current rapid adoption of artificial intelligence in the service sector will eventually result in a net increase in service-sector jobs, despite initial layoffs.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the economist's argument?

  1. Unlike physical goods, AI-generated services can be scaled instantly to meet surging consumer demand without any proportional increase in human labor for distribution or delivery.Answer
  2. B
    Historically, automation in the manufacturing sector frequently caused permanent workforce reductions in specific regions, rather than driving long-term employment growth.
  3. C
    The widespread deployment of artificial intelligence in the service sector requires the creation of entirely new departments dedicated to algorithm maintenance and data security.
  4. D
    In the agricultural sector, the rapid introduction of automated farming machinery led to a permanent, irreversible decrease in the total number of agricultural jobs.
  5. E
    No artificial intelligence system will ever be capable of perfectly replicating the highly nuanced emotional intelligence required in certain specialized service-sector jobs.

Answer

Unlike physical goods, AI-generated services can be scaled instantly to meet surging consumer demand without any proportional increase in human labor for distribution or delivery.
The argument relies on an analogy: just as automation in manufacturing ultimately created jobs by increasing consumer demand (which required more humans for sales and distribution), AI in the service sector will do the same. The correct answer attacks this analogy by pointing out a crucial difference between the two sectors: unlike manufactured goods, AI services can scale rapidly to meet higher demand without needing additional human labor. If this is true, the fundamental mechanism that created jobs in manufacturing will not function in the service sector, severely weakening the economist's conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is that the adoption of AI in the service sector will eventually result in a net increase in service-sector jobs.
Locating the conclusion is necessary to understand exactly what claim needs to be weakened.
2
Identify the premises supporting the conclusion.
The author uses an analogy to the manufacturing sector, where automation lowered costs and prices, increased demand, and subsequently created new jobs in sales, distribution, and maintenance.
Understanding the supporting logic reveals the specific mechanism the author relies on.
3
Identify the logical flaw or unstated assumption.
The argument assumes that the job-creation mechanism in manufacturing (where scaling physical goods requires human labor for distribution/sales) will identically apply to AI in the service sector.
Finding the gap between the premises and the conclusion highlights how to successfully attack the argument.
4
Evaluate the options to find one that attacks this specific assumption.
The option stating that AI-generated services can scale without a proportional increase in human labor for distribution severs the causal link assumed by the analogy.
A valid weakener must undermine the logical connection between the evidence and the conclusion, not just contradict a premise or change the subject.

Key Concept

Weakening Arguments Involving False Analogies
Rate this question

Topics

Weaken

More questions from this topic