According to the university's revised grant allocation rules, a research proposal is designated as a 'Priority-1' initiative only if it demonstrates formal interdisciplinary collaboration. Formal interdisciplinary collaboration is achieved if, and only if, the project team includes researchers from at least three distinct faculties. Furthermore, any project team that includes researchers from at least three distinct faculties requires a dedicated administrative manager, unless the proposal's principal investigator holds a tenured professorship. Finally, no proposal can be designated as a 'Priority-1' initiative if it relies on external corporate funding.
Which one of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the university's revised grant allocation rules?
- AIf a research proposal demonstrates formal interdisciplinary collaboration and does not rely on external corporate funding, then it will be designated as a 'Priority-1' initiative.
- BIf a project team either lacks a dedicated administrative manager or lacks a tenured principal investigator, then the team cannot include researchers from at least three distinct faculties.
- If a proposal whose principal investigator does not hold a tenured professorship is designated as a 'Priority-1' initiative, then the project team requires a dedicated administrative manager and the proposal cannot rely on external corporate funding.Answer
- DIf a research proposal does not demonstrate formal interdisciplinary collaboration, then its project team cannot include researchers from at least three distinct faculties, nor can it require a dedicated administrative manager.
- EProposals that rely on external corporate funding are less likely to achieve formal interdisciplinary collaboration than those funded entirely by the university.