Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardCross-Author Inference

Passage A
The transition from alchemy to modern chemistry during the seventeenth century is often mischaracterized as a gradual evolution. In reality, it constituted a sharp epistemological rupture. Early modern chemists, seeking intellectual legitimacy, established their discipline by explicitly rejecting the alchemical tradition. The cornerstone of this new scientific paradigm was a commitment to methodological transparency. Where alchemists employed deliberate obfuscation—using complex allegories and ciphers to conceal their methods from the uninitiated—the new chemists insisted on clear, step-by-step descriptions of their experiments. This rhetoric of transparency was not merely a stylistic choice; it was the foundational principle that separated legitimate natural philosophy from esoteric mysticism, enabling the collective verification of results that defines modern scientific inquiry.

Passage B
Historical narratives that posit a clean break between alchemy and early modern chemistry rely too heavily on the public declarations of seventeenth-century natural philosophers. While figures like Robert Boyle actively cultivated a public image of open, accessible science, a closer examination of their private correspondence and laboratory notebooks reveals a different reality. These early chemists continued to operate within highly restricted, secretive networks, frequently employing the very ciphers and allegorical language they publicly decried. This secrecy was driven by a desire to protect lucrative discoveries and maintain intellectual priority. The celebrated "transparency" of the era was largely a carefully managed facade. By selectively publishing certain findings while hoarding crucial methodological details, these practitioners successfully rebranded their work to align with emerging institutional expectations, even as their day-to-day practices remained deeply indebted to the secretive traditions of their alchemical predecessors.

Which one of the following most accurately describes how the author of Passage B would likely respond to the assertion in Passage A that the new chemists' "rhetoric of transparency was not merely a stylistic choice"?

  1. By asserting that this rhetoric was, in reality, a stylistic facade strategically employed to align with new institutional expectationsAnswer
  2. B
    By agreeing that transparency was a foundational principle of the new chemists' work, although it served primarily to protect intellectual priority
  3. C
    By countering that early modern chemists entirely avoided publishing clear or methodical descriptions of their experiments
  4. D
    By arguing that alchemical practitioners actually originated this rhetoric of transparency to legitimize their own esoteric mysticism
  5. E
    By contending that because this transparency was merely a rhetorical facade, early modern chemistry failed to produce any legitimate scientific discoveries

Answer

The correct option is the one stating that the author of Passage B would assert the rhetoric was a stylistic facade strategically employed to align with new institutional expectations.
The correct answer accurately synthesizes Passage B's view on the 'transparency' of early modern chemists. Passage B explicitly labels this transparency as a 'carefully managed facade' and a rebranding effort to 'align with emerging institutional expectations.' Therefore, the author of Passage B would view Passage A's claim—that the transparency was foundational and not merely stylistic—as incorrect, arguing instead that it was precisely a stylistic facade used for public relations.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the specific claim made in Passage A that needs to be evaluated.
Passage A claims that the new chemists' 'rhetoric of transparency was not merely a stylistic choice' but rather a foundational principle of legitimate natural philosophy.
Understanding the exact premise being evaluated is necessary before determining Author B's response.
2
Analyze Passage B's argument regarding the same topic (the transparency of early modern chemists).
Passage B argues that this transparency was a 'carefully managed facade' and a rebranding effort used to 'align with emerging institutional expectations,' while their actual practices remained secretive.
Author B's perspective on the core issue directly dictates how they would evaluate Author A's claim.
3
Synthesize the expected response by applying Author B's perspective to Author A's claim.
Author B would directly contradict Author A, arguing that the transparency was exactly what Author A denies: a stylistic choice (a facade) designed for public alignment rather than a true reflection of their methodology.
This bridges the viewpoints of the two authors, completing the cross-author inference.

Key Concept

Cross-Author Inference
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Cross-Author Inference

More questions from this topic